![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 3, 11:50*am, Darryl Ramm wrote:
On Apr 3, 11:26*am, Andy wrote: On Apr 3, 9:17*am, kd6veb wrote: PS Although the MRX will enhance safety I want to make it clear that it should come after the installation of a transponder. The single most important safety item is a transponder. I strongly disgree with that position. *A PCAS offers the host aircraft pilot increased awareness of all promimate transponder equipped aircraft. *A transponder offers the host aircraft pilot no increased awareness of proximate aircraft unless receiving ATC services. *It also provides pilots of proximate aircraft no increased awareness or protection unless they are either TCAS or PCAS equipped , or are receiving ATC services. Off all the near misses I have had in 30 years of flying gliders I estimate that none would have been avoided by my having a transponder and nearly all of them would have been mitigated by PCAS. Please note that I am not arguing against transponders, only about the relative merits of PCAS and transponders. I only have one MRX but it is portable and I seldom fly anything without it. Andy Many of us are impressed by the Zaon MRX as a tool to improve traffic awareness. However I think Dave is talking locations like near Reno where the concern is avoiding fast jets and commercial aircraft. In which case we need pilots to install transponders, ATC will see you (they often can't see primary radar returns) and TCAS in (almost all) of the fast Jets and all of the airliners will do a much better job of avoiding you than PCAS can in helping you avoid an airliner. The relatively short range of PCAS type solution, a short delay in identifying the threat aircraft, and the potential high closure rate of a jet (above 10,000') may not provide much useful warning. ATC Radar and TCAS as the ultimate backup is going to be much more effective. We had a near miss recently (this year) between an airliner and a glider at Reno. We had a collision between a Hawker 800 and an ASG-29 a few years ago. Neither glider were using transponders or in communication with Reno approach. If you fly near Reno its transponder first please, follow the PASCO radio procedures and be in communications with Reno approach (seehttp://www.pacificsoaring.org/safety.html#transponder) and then maybe think about having a PCAS for enhancing your traffic awareness. Going for a PCAS before a transponder in a Reno traffic like environment would be a bad choice. Darryl And I forgot to add I really do like the MRX - the reason I got one was a close call with a Cessna 172/182. He was tracking inbound to a VOR and popped out of some cloud scud. Flew right through my thermal circle. I had my head out of the cockpit, I should have seen him, was not that close to the clouds etc. Just may have been he was head on an appeared stationary and hard to see against a jumbled background. He never saw me and just kept going. Darryl |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
FWIW, I agree that the PCAS should come first. If nothing else, it
will teach you how to do a better scan. Airplanes are sometimes very hard to see in flight, but if you absolutely know something is out there you'll quickly learn how to look harder and better. After two years with the MRX, I realized that while I was alerted to other traffic (carrying transponders) they might be unaware of me. So I installed a Becker ATC-4401-175. I have seen aircraft change their course slightly to avoid me since the transponder went in, thus proving its value. I mounted my Zaon MRX in my ASW-19s panel, just under the top arch. It's protected from the sun by the overhang of the glare shield, is right in my field of vision, and is powered by the ship's battery. I have no problem hearing its advisory or alert beeps, and there is no radio interference. Again FWIW, I use an 18" length of cable to extend the (stock) antenna forward of the instrument panel. The antenna is midway between the panel and the rudder pedals, right under the glare shield. It seems to work just fine. The reason I moved it away from the MRX is because I didn't want to poke it through the glare shield. -John |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
mounting a PCAS on the glareshield | Mike Noel | Owning | 2 | September 29th 08 11:08 PM |
Panel mounted GPS on E-Bay. | Tri-Pacer | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | May 3rd 07 08:40 PM |
PCAS interfering with radio | John Sinclair | Soaring | 3 | March 12th 07 02:02 AM |
Fin Mounted TE Prob vs fuselage mounted TE prob | [email protected] | Soaring | 8 | June 4th 05 10:39 PM |
Panel mounted WindowsCE device | tango4 | Soaring | 8 | December 13th 03 06:20 AM |