![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Kuykendall wrote:
On Dec 12, 7:36 pm, jcarlyle wrote: ...is there some way for getting them into the same frame of reference? I'd recommend that you come to terms with MAC. As they say in Make Magazine, if you can't open it, you don't really own it. This article describes a graphical method for determining the MAC of a double-taper wing such as that of your LS8: http://www.djaerotech.com/dj_askjd/d...s/canard1.html There are also calculators available on the Web for determining the MAC of a multi-tapered wing numerically. Once you determine the length of the MAC, locating it with reference to the aircraft longitudinal axis is a matter of simple surveying that you can do with a yard stick and some strings and plumb bobs. Sensible remainder snipped... I'm not really intending to argue w. Bob K.'s position or reasoning, just offering a slightly differing view...at least insofar as 'real world' determination of CG is concerned. For lots of sensible - if occasionally murky-at-first-glance - reasons, the aerodynamic field has a love affair with mathematically elegant approaches. While calculation of CG is arguably 'merely' a W&B arithmetic exercise, the aerodynamic implications are obvious to anyone who's ever flown models. That noted... When it comes to *Joe Owner* verifying a ship's CG position, I've long thought designers'/factories' use of MAC just a touch lazy. Since the designer has obviously already done the math, IMHO Joe Designer should take the next step and translate their (useful to those in the aerodynamic field) MAC datum to some trivially-easy-to-locate fuselage datum: less chance for user error, arguably reduced liability (sigh), etc. Why have Joe Owner 're-design the wheel' every single time for every single ship? If we assume CG-calc-accuracy is the goal, then failing to make it straightforward to owners/others to perform, is (ruminatively): thoughtless, lazy, obtuse, arrogantly didactic, etc. Personally, I don't like RE-messing with plumb bobs when someone else already has... Regards, Bob - lazy, degreed AE sort - W. P.S I blame my whine of a week+ of below 0 (F) temps prior to the onset of winter. Where's Global Warming when you want it?!? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Need a little more range for your 304S jet? | Marc Ramsey[_2_] | Soaring | 1 | July 22nd 07 01:39 PM |
VOR volume range | kevmor | Instrument Flight Rules | 7 | February 7th 07 10:46 PM |
Long range Wx | Paul kgyy | Piloting | 4 | December 31st 04 04:25 PM |
What is the range of the B-1B? | user | Military Aviation | 10 | December 24th 03 04:15 AM |
Fuel Range | Toks Desalu | Home Built | 2 | November 14th 03 12:51 PM |