![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Most gliders imported into the US or built within the US were issued a TCDS.
There is your certificate BT "Tony" wrote in message ... I think it's worth noting that Part 45 only applies to aircraft built under a type certificate. Tony |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 22, 12:23*pm, Bob Kuykendall wrote:
On Jan 22, 6:45*am, Tony wrote: I think it's worth noting that Part 45 only applies to aircraft built under a type certificate. I don't think that's correct. Here's what § 45.1(a) says: § 45.1 * Applicability. This part prescribes the requirements for— (a) Identification of aircraft, and identification of aircraft engines *and propellers that are manufactured under the terms of a type *or production certificate... The way I read that § 45.1(a), the first "and" means that part § 45 prescribes the requirements for both the identification of aircraft _and_ the identification of certificated engines and propellers. Note that the way that sentence is constructed, the qualifier "manufactured under the terms of a type or production certificate" does not necessarily apply to "aircraft," so it could be construed as "all aircraft." I admit that paragraph (a) might be a bit ambiguous, and I think that it would be better if it was broken out into two paragraphs, something like: (a) Identification of aircraft. (b) Identification of aircraft engines and propellers yadda yadda... However, I'm personally convinced that § 45.1(a) means that all of Part 45 applies to experimental as well as certificated aircraft. That seems to be the consensus in the RV-series homebuilt aircraft community, I think that pretty much all of them carry external dataplates. Thanks, Bob K.www.hpaircraft.com ok, i read that wrong. after reading through several other regs and advisory circulars its obvious that this rule applies to all aircraft. i guess i better print off that letter... |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 22, 11:28*am, Burt Compton - Marfa wrote:
the compass correction card Burt, Can you please point me to any regulation that requires a compass correction card, or even a compass, to be fitted in a US registered glider. I know of no such regulation and a compass is not required by my minimum equipment list. A recent AOPA on-line quiz question about correction cards provided an incorrect answer to this citing a regulation that referenced only airplanes but asserting it applied to aircraft. Maybe there's another regulation that I'm not aware of. My local FSDO is on an inspection spree so it would be good to be prepared. thanks Andy |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 22, 1:14*pm, Andy wrote:
On Jan 22, 11:28*am, Burt Compton - Marfa wrote: the compass correction card Burt, Can you please point me to any regulation that requires a compass correction card, or even a compass, to be fitted in a US registered glider. *I know of no such regulation and a compass is not required by my minimum equipment list. A recent AOPA on-line quiz question about correction cards provided an incorrect answer to this citing a regulation that referenced only airplanes but asserting it applied to aircraft. Maybe there's another regulation that I'm not aware of. My local FSDO is on an inspection spree so it would be good to be prepared. thanks Andy I think Burt's comment was that the FAA inspectors don't always know that the compass correction card (or compass) is not required on a glider. Better to have a plan in place than to argue with an inspector when they're looking to ground your glider. Mike |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I think Burt's comment was that the FAA inspectors don't always know that the compass correction card (or compass) is not required on a glider. *Better to have a plan in place than to argue with an inspector when they're looking to ground your glider. Mike Exactly what I'm saying -- over prepare a bit, have a easy 5 minute ramp check, then go fly! |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just to confuse the matter further (because I like to do that) might I
suggest a careful reading of 14CFR45.11? The first thing you will find under "GeneraL" is a "Link to an amendment published at 74 FR 53394, October 16, 2009." If we skip this ammendment for now, you will read in paragraph (a) that "Aircraft covered under §21.182 of this chapter must be identified..." So, what does §21.182 say? It says: "§ 21.182 Aircraft identification. (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each applicant for an airworthiness certificate under this subpart must show that his aircraft is identified as prescribed in §45.11. (b) Paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to applicants for the following: (1) A special flight permit. (2) An experimental certificate for an aircraft not issued for the purpose of operating amateur-built aircraft, operating primary kit- built aircraft, or operating light-sport aircraft. (3) A change from one airworthiness classification to another, for an aircraft already identified as prescribed in §45.11. So, the requirement to identify per 45.11 DOES NOT APPLY to aircraft applying for an Experimental certificate issued for Exhibition and Air Racing. Or Show Compliance with FARs. Or Market Survey. Or Research and Development. Says so right there. I am not making this up. Copied directly from the FAA e-CFRs. You can look it up. Further down in 45.11, it says "On aircraft manufactured before March 7, 1988, the identification plate required by paragraph (a) of this section..." Well, paragraph (a) exempts aircraft with an Experimental Exhibition and Racing Airworthiness Certificate from the requirement for the plate upon application for an Airworthiness Certificate after that date, so those manufactured before that date are also exempt from the requirement, as they referenced a paragraph that provides the exemption. If you have a Standard Airworthiness Certificate, Experimental Amateur Built, Primary Kit-Built, or Light Sport, you have to have the dataplate. New or old manufacture. Now if you would like to really have the waters muddied, read that ammendment. As I read it, the requirement to identify gliders manufactured before the initial issue of the regulation (March 7, 1988) has now been removed. The only gliders that must carry the data plate are those that apply for an airworthiness certificate after October 16, 2009 (the date of the ammendment). But not if they apply for Experimental Exhibition and Racing. Did the SSA maybe influence the FAA to exempt gliders from the requirement for the external dataplate? Read the ammendment and let's hear what you think it says! Steve |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Leonard wrote:
Just to confuse the matter further (because I like to do that) might I suggest a careful reading of 14CFR45.11? The first thing you will find under "GeneraL" is a "Link to an amendment published at 74 FR 53394, October 16, 2009." If we skip this ammendment for now, you will read in paragraph (a) that "Aircraft covered under §21.182 of this chapter must be identified..." So, what does §21.182 say? It says: "§ 21.182 Aircraft identification. (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each applicant for an airworthiness certificate under this subpart must show that his aircraft is identified as prescribed in §45.11. (b) Paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to applicants for the following: (1) A special flight permit. (2) An experimental certificate for an aircraft not issued for the purpose of operating amateur-built aircraft, operating primary kit- built aircraft, or operating light-sport aircraft. (3) A change from one airworthiness classification to another, for an aircraft already identified as prescribed in §45.11. So, the requirement to identify per 45.11 DOES NOT APPLY to aircraft applying for an Experimental certificate issued for Exhibition and Air Racing. Or Show Compliance with FARs. Or Market Survey. Or Research and Development. Says so right there. I am not making this up. Copied directly from the FAA e-CFRs. You can look it up. Further down in 45.11, it says "On aircraft manufactured before March 7, 1988, the identification plate required by paragraph (a) of this section..." Well, paragraph (a) exempts aircraft with an Experimental Exhibition and Racing Airworthiness Certificate from the requirement for the plate upon application for an Airworthiness Certificate after that date, so those manufactured before that date are also exempt from the requirement, as they referenced a paragraph that provides the exemption. If you have a Standard Airworthiness Certificate, Experimental Amateur Built, Primary Kit-Built, or Light Sport, you have to have the dataplate. New or old manufacture. Now if you would like to really have the waters muddied, read that ammendment. As I read it, the requirement to identify gliders manufactured before the initial issue of the regulation (March 7, 1988) has now been removed. The only gliders that must carry the data plate are those that apply for an airworthiness certificate after October 16, 2009 (the date of the ammendment). But not if they apply for Experimental Exhibition and Racing. Did the SSA maybe influence the FAA to exempt gliders from the requirement for the external dataplate? Read the ammendment and let's hear what you think it says! Steve To make it easier for the curious, I presume the amendment is the one he http://tinyurl.com/yc9ufsv. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Leonard wrote:
Just to confuse the matter further (because I like to do that) might I suggest a careful reading of 14CFR45.11? The first thing you will find under "GeneraL" is a "Link to an amendment published at 74 FR 53394, October 16, 2009." If we skip this ammendment for now, you will read in paragraph (a) that "Aircraft covered under §21.182 of this chapter must be identified..." So, what does §21.182 say? It says: "§ 21.182 Aircraft identification. (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each applicant for an airworthiness certificate under this subpart must show that his aircraft is identified as prescribed in §45.11. (b) Paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to applicants for the following: (1) A special flight permit. (2) An experimental certificate for an aircraft not issued for the purpose of operating amateur-built aircraft, operating primary kit- built aircraft, or operating light-sport aircraft. (3) A change from one airworthiness classification to another, for an aircraft already identified as prescribed in §45.11. So, the requirement to identify per 45.11 DOES NOT APPLY to aircraft applying for an Experimental certificate issued for Exhibition and Air Racing. Or Show Compliance with FARs. Or Market Survey. Or Research and Development. Says so right there. I am not making this up. Copied directly from the FAA e-CFRs. You can look it up. Further down in 45.11, it says "On aircraft manufactured before March 7, 1988, the identification plate required by paragraph (a) of this section..." Well, paragraph (a) exempts aircraft with an Experimental Exhibition and Racing Airworthiness Certificate from the requirement for the plate upon application for an Airworthiness Certificate after that date, so those manufactured before that date are also exempt from the requirement, as they referenced a paragraph that provides the exemption. If you have a Standard Airworthiness Certificate, Experimental Amateur Built, Primary Kit-Built, or Light Sport, you have to have the dataplate. New or old manufacture. Now if you would like to really have the waters muddied, read that ammendment. As I read it, the requirement to identify gliders manufactured before the initial issue of the regulation (March 7, 1988) has now been removed. The only gliders that must carry the data plate are those that apply for an airworthiness certificate after October 16, 2009 (the date of the ammendment). But not if they apply for Experimental Exhibition and Racing. Did the SSA maybe influence the FAA to exempt gliders from the requirement for the external dataplate? Read the ammendment and let's hear what you think it says! Steve Sounds like the amendment exempts gliders manufactured before March 7, 1988, while those manufactured after that date still need the fireproof data plate but it need not be on the exterior. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 22, 7:02*pm, Burt Compton - Marfa wrote:
I think Burt's comment was that the FAA inspectors don't always know that the compass correction card (or compass) is not required on a glider. *Better to have a plan in place than to argue with an inspector when they're looking to ground your glider. Mike Exactly what I'm saying -- over prepare a bit, have a easy 5 minute ramp check, then go fly! Don't forget to install an oil pressure and oil temperature gauge as well. They are required for some aircraft so you must have them in your glider too! Andy |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 22, 9:21*pm, Greg Arnold wrote:
To make it easier for the curious, I presume the amendment is the one he *http://tinyurl.com/yc9ufsv Yes, Greg. That is the amendment. And I think it exempts all gliders manufactured prior to that amendment date, or October 16, 2009. Remember, the paragraph that talks to March 7, 1988 does not apply to gliders anymore. So, anything in that amendment for glider applies from the date of the amendment forward. And any application for airworthiness for Experimental Exhibition and Racing is still exempt directly from 21.182. Of course, getting the FAA person to understand their rule may be another matter! Steve |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
For USA: Data Plate Exemption? | rlovinggood | Soaring | 7 | January 29th 08 03:39 PM |
California Tax exemption - gone after Oct 1st | Limus A. | Soaring | 1 | August 6th 04 04:46 PM |
Cal Tax Exemption | Gary L | Home Built | 5 | January 27th 04 01:38 PM |
Cal Tax Exemption | Gary L | Owning | 0 | January 25th 04 08:14 PM |
Data Plate Exemption Letter | Steve Bralla | Soaring | 8 | October 13th 03 02:22 AM |