![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 7, 6:47*pm, Tony wrote:
On Mar 7, 7:05*pm, GM wrote: On Wednesday, March 7, 2012 3:17:37 PM UTC-5, Tony wrote: needs a little work. http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/Vie...Item=276309655 Can this one be aero-towed or winch launched? Getting the fuel for the small rocket engine might become a problem. That stuff was said to have some nasty habits like catching fire when it comes in contact with certain materials and being extremely corrosive. i think i saw something online that the US acquired a few after the war and towed them with B-29's while test pilots checked them out. Perhaps we need to notify the Commemorative Air Force and see if they will put a towhook on Fifi! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmSNqHckry8 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 18:12:04 -0800, Bill D wrote:
On Mar 7, 6:47Â*pm, Tony wrote: On Mar 7, 7:05Â*pm, GM wrote: On Wednesday, March 7, 2012 3:17:37 PM UTC-5, Tony wrote: needs a little work. http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/Vie...Item=276309655 Can this one be aero-towed or winch launched? Getting the fuel for the small rocket engine might become a problem. That stuff was said to have some nasty habits like catching fire when it comes in contact with certain materials and being extremely corrosive. i think i saw something online that the US acquired a few after the war and towed them with B-29's while test pilots checked them out. Perhaps we need to notify the Commemorative Air Force and see if they will put a towhook on Fifi! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmSNqHckry8 That's obviously the unpowered replica. Nearly a year ago I visited RAF Cosford on a wet day during a CGC gliding expedition to The Mynd. Cosford which has a fantastic collection of Cold War British aircraft including all the V-bombers as well as a wonderful collection of late 60s British experimental jets and a selection of WW2 aircraft including a Me-163B. I was intrigued to see it has a tow hook in exactly the same place as that replica and wonder why. Was it for aero-towed retrieves if it had to land out after a combat sortie and/or for moving them between airfields? -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The 163 used 100% peroxide as the oxidizer. Nasty stuff that would
"burn" anything it could come in contact with. F-16 doesn't glide any better than a lawn dart. F-15 glides beautifully. I once rode in one that glided 75 miles from flight level 400, in flight idle, joker fuel, to pattern altitude without touching the throttle. mj |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 8, 3:47*pm, Mark Jardini wrote:
The 163 used 100% peroxide as the oxidizer. Nasty stuff that would "burn" anything it could come in contact with. F-16 doesn't glide any better than a lawn dart. F-15 glides beautifully. I once rode in one that glided 75 miles from flight level 400, in flight idle, joker fuel, to pattern altitude without touching the throttle. mj Hmm, that's 11/1, with idle thrust (which is not trivial in an Eagle). F-16s use 6/1 for flameout approach (1000' for every mile away from field), probably at around 250 - 300 knots. F-15 is wonderful, but hardly a glider! I've done formation recoveries on the wing of F-4s in Aggressor T-38s (this is a long time ago!). F-4 was at probably 75 - 80%, while the 38 was at idle and using the speed brakes to maintain formation. No doubt which was the better "glider" between those 2 jets! Kirk 66 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In my wave flight presentations, I always end the talk with a slide
stating that the ideal wave machine is: - Vne high (most important) - Proven design - Self-launching - and from manufacturers we already know. .... then I have a pic of the Me163. Wow! Now it's only a matter of money to restore it to flight status....... Kemp |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 8, 3:12*pm, "kirk.stant" wrote:
On Mar 8, 3:47*pm, Mark Jardini wrote: The 163 used 100% peroxide as the oxidizer. Nasty stuff that would "burn" anything it could come in contact with. F-16 doesn't glide any better than a lawn dart. F-15 glides beautifully. I once rode in one that glided 75 miles from flight level 400, in flight idle, joker fuel, to pattern altitude without touching the throttle. mj Hmm, that's 11/1, with idle thrust (which is not trivial in an Eagle). F-16s use 6/1 for flameout approach (1000' for every mile away from field), probably at around 250 - 300 knots. F-15 is wonderful, but hardly a glider! I've done formation recoveries on the wing of F-4s in Aggressor T-38s (this is a long time ago!). *F-4 was at probably 75 - 80%, while the 38 was at idle and using the speed brakes to maintain formation. *No doubt which was the better "glider" between those 2 jets! Kirk 66 I'd bet good money that an F-22 will out-glide any of the 4th and earlier generation fighters. Look ma! No external stores! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 13:34:02 -0800, Martin Gregorie
wrote: On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 18:12:04 -0800, Bill D wrote: On Mar 7, 6:47 pm, Tony wrote: On Mar 7, 7:05 pm, GM wrote: On Wednesday, March 7, 2012 3:17:37 PM UTC-5, Tony wrote: needs a little work. http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/Vie...Item=276309655 Can this one be aero-towed or winch launched? Getting the fuel for the small rocket engine might become a problem. That stuff was said to have some nasty habits like catching fire when it comes in contact with certain materials and being extremely corrosive. i think i saw something online that the US acquired a few after the war and towed them with B-29's while test pilots checked them out. Perhaps we need to notify the Commemorative Air Force and see if they will put a towhook on Fifi! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmSNqHckry8 That's obviously the unpowered replica. Nearly a year ago I visited RAF Cosford on a wet day during a CGC gliding expedition to The Mynd. Cosford which has a fantastic collection of Cold War British aircraft including all the V-bombers as well as a wonderful collection of late 60s British experimental jets and a selection of WW2 aircraft including a Me-163B. I was intrigued to see it has a tow hook in exactly the same place as that replica and wonder why. Was it for aero-towed retrieves if it had to land out after a combat sortie and/or for moving them between airfields? Here's an excellent video with lots of detailed shots. Tost hook is clearly shown. Also, I'd never noticed the split flaps / drag devices which are deployed in this video. Revolutionaly airplane in many aspects. Craig -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 13:54:15 -0800, Craig Funston
wrote: On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 13:34:02 -0800, Martin Gregorie wrote: On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 18:12:04 -0800, Bill D wrote: On Mar 7, 6:47 pm, Tony wrote: On Mar 7, 7:05 pm, GM wrote: On Wednesday, March 7, 2012 3:17:37 PM UTC-5, Tony wrote: needs a little work. http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/Vie...Item=276309655 Can this one be aero-towed or winch launched? Getting the fuel for the small rocket engine might become a problem. That stuff was said to have some nasty habits like catching fire when it comes in contact with certain materials and being extremely corrosive. i think i saw something online that the US acquired a few after the war and towed them with B-29's while test pilots checked them out. Perhaps we need to notify the Commemorative Air Force and see if they will put a towhook on Fifi! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmSNqHckry8 That's obviously the unpowered replica. Nearly a year ago I visited RAF Cosford on a wet day during a CGC gliding expedition to The Mynd. Cosford which has a fantastic collection of Cold War British aircraft including all the V-bombers as well as a wonderful collection of late 60s British experimental jets and a selection of WW2 aircraft including a Me-163B. I was intrigued to see it has a tow hook in exactly the same place as that replica and wonder why. Was it for aero-towed retrieves if it had to land out after a combat sortie and/or for moving them between airfields? Here's an excellent video with lots of detailed shots. Tost hook is clearly shown. Also, I'd never noticed the split flaps / drag devices which are deployed in this video. Revolutionaly airplane in many aspects. Craig It might help to add the link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrMmm...layer_embedded -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DG 400 Motorglider for sale | Leo Montejo | Soaring | 8 | September 19th 10 12:40 AM |
DG 400 Motorglider for sale | Leo Montejo | Soaring | 0 | September 16th 10 04:35 PM |
Lambada Motorglider For Sale | JS[_3_] | Soaring | 10 | January 31st 08 06:19 PM |
For Sale - Cambridge 302 for Motorglider - Used | Paul Remde | Soaring | 0 | September 26th 05 07:05 PM |
MONI motorglider / sportplane for sale | Bill Berle | Aviation Marketplace | 7 | August 2nd 03 12:05 AM |