A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Question about spoilers and pitch stability



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 16th 13, 12:14 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Don Johnstone[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 398
Default Question about spoilers and pitch stability

At 15:12 02 February 2013, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 20:42:53 -0800, Larry Suter wrote:

In his article on avoiding PIO in Grob 103's,

http://www.soaringsafety.org/pilots/ic8.htm

Dean Carswell writes, "the more the airbrakes are closed, the less

pitch
stability the Grob will have, making a PIO more likely if otherwise
mishandled"

I've not noticed that a Grob G.103a is any less stable in pitch than, say


an ASK.21 or a Puchacz regardless of airbrake setting, but all three do
have different responses to *opening* the brakes. This might cause an ab
initio or a new solo pilot some problems when moving between the types.

- the ASK.21 has almost no attitude change and not much airspeed change
when the brakes are opened

- the Puchacz has very powerful, speed-limiting brakes and a tendency to
pitch up and so will show a noticable drop in airspeed when they are
opened. In consequence you soon learn to push the stick forward as you
open the brakes.

- the Grob G.103a has the opposite reaction: when you open the airbrakes
it has a tendency to drop its nose and accelerate. I had speed control
issues when I first flew one (pre-solo). So, at altitude we trimmed it
to 60 kts hands off and, still hands off, opened the brakes fully. The
glider lowered its nose and accelerated to almost 70 kts. Closing the
brakes caused the nose to rise and the airspeed to settle back to 60
kts. After this demo I took note and found its speed control much
easier to manage.

I do wonder, though, if opening the brakes suddenly[*] on a G.103 after a


too fast approach followed by a not fully held-off landing could tap the
front wheel on the runway. This could easily start a PIO in the hands of
an inexperienced pilot. However if this is the case I'd say the PIO was
due to the fast approach, lack of properly held-off landing and
inexperience on type for the PIO rather than any lack of pitch stability.

[*] not forgetting that the G103 brakes do have a tendency to snatch
open, especially with the airspeed above 60 kts.

My club's fleet contains all three types. My first 20 launches were
equally split between the ASK21 and G103a. I first met the Puchacz on my
21st launch. All these were winch launches in case you're wondering.


Martin has this right. The problem with opening the brakes on a Grob 103 is
that doing so will cause the nose to pitch down, closing the brakes will
cause the nose to pitch up, try it. You can actually fly a Grob 103 using
the spoilers to control pitch, not very well but it works. The apparent PIO
is different to the nosewheel contact and is caused by over correction,
this is especially true if the stick and airbrake lever are moved in
different directions, magnifying the effectiveness of the elevator.

The 103 airbrakes are linear in operation as regards airspeed. At 55 knots
the airbrakes will sit at roughly half deployment with no pressure on the
lever, closing if the speed is reduced and opening if it is increased. They
sit fully open with no pressure on the lever at about 60-65 knots.
On of the requirements of an airtest following service on the military
G103s in the UK was to accelerate to VNE and also operate the airbrakes at
about 70 kts in the recovery, at 70 kts the airbrakes will suck out very
quickly and over that speed the rate of uncontrolled deployment is very
rapid indeed.
As far as I am aware the airbrakes are rated for full deployment up to VNE,
probably break your wrist though when you unlock them.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stability variation WingFlaps Piloting 2 April 28th 08 03:45 AM
Towing stability studies Dan G Soaring 27 February 21st 08 08:38 PM
Tow vehicle -- electronic stability control Greg Arnold Soaring 4 June 8th 06 12:31 PM
Atmospheric stability and lapse rate Andrew Sarangan Piloting 39 February 11th 05 05:34 AM
Prop Pitch Question Eugene Wendland Home Built 2 April 25th 04 03:22 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.