![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 15:12 02 February 2013, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 20:42:53 -0800, Larry Suter wrote: In his article on avoiding PIO in Grob 103's, http://www.soaringsafety.org/pilots/ic8.htm Dean Carswell writes, "the more the airbrakes are closed, the less pitch stability the Grob will have, making a PIO more likely if otherwise mishandled" I've not noticed that a Grob G.103a is any less stable in pitch than, say an ASK.21 or a Puchacz regardless of airbrake setting, but all three do have different responses to *opening* the brakes. This might cause an ab initio or a new solo pilot some problems when moving between the types. - the ASK.21 has almost no attitude change and not much airspeed change when the brakes are opened - the Puchacz has very powerful, speed-limiting brakes and a tendency to pitch up and so will show a noticable drop in airspeed when they are opened. In consequence you soon learn to push the stick forward as you open the brakes. - the Grob G.103a has the opposite reaction: when you open the airbrakes it has a tendency to drop its nose and accelerate. I had speed control issues when I first flew one (pre-solo). So, at altitude we trimmed it to 60 kts hands off and, still hands off, opened the brakes fully. The glider lowered its nose and accelerated to almost 70 kts. Closing the brakes caused the nose to rise and the airspeed to settle back to 60 kts. After this demo I took note and found its speed control much easier to manage. I do wonder, though, if opening the brakes suddenly[*] on a G.103 after a too fast approach followed by a not fully held-off landing could tap the front wheel on the runway. This could easily start a PIO in the hands of an inexperienced pilot. However if this is the case I'd say the PIO was due to the fast approach, lack of properly held-off landing and inexperience on type for the PIO rather than any lack of pitch stability. [*] not forgetting that the G103 brakes do have a tendency to snatch open, especially with the airspeed above 60 kts. My club's fleet contains all three types. My first 20 launches were equally split between the ASK21 and G103a. I first met the Puchacz on my 21st launch. All these were winch launches in case you're wondering. Martin has this right. The problem with opening the brakes on a Grob 103 is that doing so will cause the nose to pitch down, closing the brakes will cause the nose to pitch up, try it. You can actually fly a Grob 103 using the spoilers to control pitch, not very well but it works. The apparent PIO is different to the nosewheel contact and is caused by over correction, this is especially true if the stick and airbrake lever are moved in different directions, magnifying the effectiveness of the elevator. The 103 airbrakes are linear in operation as regards airspeed. At 55 knots the airbrakes will sit at roughly half deployment with no pressure on the lever, closing if the speed is reduced and opening if it is increased. They sit fully open with no pressure on the lever at about 60-65 knots. On of the requirements of an airtest following service on the military G103s in the UK was to accelerate to VNE and also operate the airbrakes at about 70 kts in the recovery, at 70 kts the airbrakes will suck out very quickly and over that speed the rate of uncontrolled deployment is very rapid indeed. As far as I am aware the airbrakes are rated for full deployment up to VNE, probably break your wrist though when you unlock them. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stability variation | WingFlaps | Piloting | 2 | April 28th 08 03:45 AM |
Towing stability studies | Dan G | Soaring | 27 | February 21st 08 08:38 PM |
Tow vehicle -- electronic stability control | Greg Arnold | Soaring | 4 | June 8th 06 12:31 PM |
Atmospheric stability and lapse rate | Andrew Sarangan | Piloting | 39 | February 11th 05 05:34 AM |
Prop Pitch Question | Eugene Wendland | Home Built | 2 | April 25th 04 03:22 AM |