~ DEPLETED URANIUM - AMERIKA'S 'OK TO USE' WMD ~

From: Phil Miller

On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 17:30:27 -0500, Cub Driver
wrote:

On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 21:25:26 +1100, Phil Miller
wrote:

1. Depleted Uranium is not nuclear waste in the sense that it is not the
highly radioactive remains of spent reactor fuel.

Phil, why waste your time and energy replying to trolls?

These are sad, sick folks all eaten up with hate. Let their own
stomach acid finish the job.

all the best -- Dan Ford

G'day Dan,

As always, the rebuttal is not for the dyed in the wool loon, or troll,
but for the lurker who might assume the Loon(TM) has actually researched
it's claim and it has some basis in reality. Hopefully we can make them
go from "Yeah, right on (insert Loon here)." to "Oh, wait. Maybe there's
more to this than (insert Loon here) claims?".

Plus, I enjoy the research.

Cheers,

Phil
--

Phil, please don't insult loons. They are nice birds.

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired

On 27 Mar 2004 04:53:34 GMT, (B2431) wrote:

From: Phil Miller

On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 17:30:27 -0500, Cub Driver
wrote:

On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 21:25:26 +1100, Phil Miller
wrote:

1. Depleted Uranium is not nuclear waste in the sense that it is not the
highly radioactive remains of spent reactor fuel.

Phil, why waste your time and energy replying to trolls?

These are sad, sick folks all eaten up with hate. Let their own
stomach acid finish the job.

all the best -- Dan Ford

G'day Dan,

As always, the rebuttal is not for the dyed in the wool loon, or troll,
but for the lurker who might assume the Loon(TM) has actually researched
it's claim and it has some basis in reality. Hopefully we can make them
go from "Yeah, right on (insert Loon here)." to "Oh, wait. Maybe there's
more to this than (insert Loon here) claims?".

Plus, I enjoy the research.

Cheers,

Phil
--

Phil, please don't insult loons. They are nice birds.

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired

Oh. Sorry. Maybe I should have used the archaic Tarvereese spelling,
lune?


Phil
--
Great Tarverisms #4

The clerk boy is practicly illiterate.

John

alt.disasters.aviation
10 November 2002

From: Phil Miller


On 27 Mar 2004 04:53:34 GMT, (B2431) wrote:

From: Phil Miller

On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 17:30:27 -0500, Cub Driver
wrote:

On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 21:25:26 +1100, Phil Miller
wrote:

1. Depleted Uranium is not nuclear waste in the sense that it is not the
highly radioactive remains of spent reactor fuel.

Phil, why waste your time and energy replying to trolls?

These are sad, sick folks all eaten up with hate. Let their own
stomach acid finish the job.

all the best -- Dan Ford

G'day Dan,

As always, the rebuttal is not for the dyed in the wool loon, or troll,
but for the lurker who might assume the Loon(TM) has actually researched
it's claim and it has some basis in reality. Hopefully we can make them
go from "Yeah, right on (insert Loon here)." to "Oh, wait. Maybe there's
more to this than (insert Loon here) claims?".

Plus, I enjoy the research.

Cheers,

Phil
--

Phil, please don't insult loons. They are nice birds.

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired

Oh. Sorry. Maybe I should have used the archaic Tarvereese spelling,
lune?


Phil

Actually that fool spells it "lun."

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired