![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Howdy, Jukka. Always a pleasure to hear from you. Howdy, but you probably mix me with Jukka O. Kauppinen? Undoubtably ![]() guy. some G-6s were preferred over G-10s and Ks, if the former were considered to be of better manufacture. As an dogfighter most powerful, lightest and reliable engine would be preferred option if flight characteristics otherwise doesn't decline. The greater speed of the later, more powerful models was often gained at the expense of a piston rod flying out the hood at bad moments. Apparently, blowing an engine in the Emil took real effort - by the time you got to a G-14 or K, the engine was likely to blow up after even a few moments at boost. Heard that from several different pilots - two of them blew up their motors under identical circumstances; one made a deadstick landing from 9,000 m (at night!), the other dumped his into a lake outside Berlin. The screws were so eager to hang him for the loss of a brand new G-14 that they went to the trouble of fishing the 109 out of the lake - when the damage was obviously due to defects in the blower, they let the pilot off the hook. Did engine upgrades happen in field also in E-, G- and K-series Me-109's and was there a preferred engine/blower combo? Field upgrades - Usually not, as far as I know. Everyone preferred the AS motors once they became available. I have read that DB's (and alla others) engines quality diminish all the time, estimated work hours dropped hundreds of hours to some dozen hours. Absolutely. I have a complaint letter from an NJG 11 Staffelkapitan to the wing, gritching about engine life being ~15 hours before replacement (dated March 45) - granted, by that time, the pilots were running scared and boost was being selected a lot more often than the manufacturer intended. Thats why aces wanted to stay "old" models and engines? That probably had a hand in it, plus wing loading got so bad the later models were becoming real pigs. A good G-2 or G-5, sent back to the factory and returned as a later model was almost guaranteed to come back as a handling nightmare. v/r Gordon ====(A+C==== USN SAR An LZ is a place you want to land, not stay. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hiroshima/Nagasaki vs conventional B-17 bombing | zxcv | Military Aviation | 55 | April 4th 04 07:05 AM |
Good Ad! WWII Pilot | Joe | Military Aviation | 0 | January 11th 04 09:37 PM |
P-47/51 deflection shots into the belly of the German tanks,reality | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 131 | September 7th 03 09:02 PM |
FA: WWII B-3jacket, B-1 pants, Class A uniform | N329DF | Military Aviation | 1 | August 16th 03 03:41 PM |