A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Borgelt B50 and PowerFLARM Question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 12th 15, 07:47 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Roger S
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Borgelt B50 and PowerFLARM Question

On Monday, 11 May 2015 17:18:12 UTC+1, Paul Remde wrote:
Hi,

A customer has asked me to help him connect his PowerFLARM Core to his
Borgelt B50 and Naviter Oudie.

He had ordered a K6 Mux - which would definitely work, but I wonder if a
simpler and less expensive cable solution would also work well. I have the
required Goddard PBvB50 cable in stock.

The B50 manual states that it communicates at 4800 baud by default and can
be configured using a jumper to communicate at 9600 baud. The PowerFLARM
and Oudie can also be configured to communicate at 9600 baud.

The big question and the reason for this post is that I'm concerned as to
whether all the GPS and FLARM and B50 vario data can get through every
update at 9600 baud. Most FLARM systems use 19200 baud or higher to make
sure all the data gets through. Does anyone know whether or not this
approach would work?

The goal is to minimize the customer's cost while providing a reliable
system.

Best Regards,

Paul Remde
Cumulus Soaring, Inc.


My experience says it won't work with the FLARM feeding through B50 - there isn't enough time to get the data through at 9600. I managed to get a B50 working with a plain GPS by configuring the GPS to output the minimum number of NMEA sentences as the default GPS setting sent too much data and it got garbled. With FLARM data as well there would just be too much.

Roger

  #2  
Old May 12th 15, 04:05 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Paul Remde
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,691
Default Borgelt B50 and PowerFLARM Question

Hi Roger,

Thank you for your feedback. I appreciate it.

I also received a reply from Mike Borgelt stating simply and correctly that
FLARM states that 19200 baud is required. Therefore, I have put together a
K6 Mux system for the customer. It receives the B50 data at 4800 baud and
the FLARM data at 19200 baud and sends everything to the Oudie at 19200
baud. The customer will receive a "plug-n-play" system. The K6 Mux is a
great product. I was just trying to look at all possibilities in an effort
to minimize cost for the customer.

Best Regards,

Paul Remde
Cumulus Soaring, Inc.

"Roger S" wrote in message
...

On Monday, 11 May 2015 17:18:12 UTC+1, Paul Remde wrote:
Hi,

A customer has asked me to help him connect his PowerFLARM Core to his
Borgelt B50 and Naviter Oudie.

He had ordered a K6 Mux - which would definitely work, but I wonder if a
simpler and less expensive cable solution would also work well. I have
the
required Goddard PBvB50 cable in stock.

The B50 manual states that it communicates at 4800 baud by default and can
be configured using a jumper to communicate at 9600 baud. The PowerFLARM
and Oudie can also be configured to communicate at 9600 baud.

The big question and the reason for this post is that I'm concerned as to
whether all the GPS and FLARM and B50 vario data can get through every
update at 9600 baud. Most FLARM systems use 19200 baud or higher to make
sure all the data gets through. Does anyone know whether or not this
approach would work?

The goal is to minimize the customer's cost while providing a reliable
system.

Best Regards,

Paul Remde
Cumulus Soaring, Inc.


My experience says it won't work with the FLARM feeding through B50 - there
isn't enough time to get the data through at 9600. I managed to get a B50
working with a plain GPS by configuring the GPS to output the minimum number
of NMEA sentences as the default GPS setting sent too much data and it got
garbled. With FLARM data as well there would just be too much.

Roger

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question about PowerFlarm IGC recording rate SoaringXCellence Soaring 5 June 6th 13 11:51 PM
Stupid PowerFLARM Question Peter von Tresckow Soaring 9 March 1st 12 11:50 AM
PowerFLARM Mode S question kirk.stant Soaring 54 October 26th 10 02:51 PM
Borgelt B40 question tuno Soaring 4 June 17th 04 02:33 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.