![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, March 10, 2018 at 9:35:06 PM UTC-5, Nick Kennedy wrote:
I think for robust, durable, bullet proof, idiot proof logging I'd go with a Nano. There is nothing worse than doing a flight you planned out, completed it and then having a logger failure. Been there, its a bummer. Get a Nano and you will have trouble free logging for all levels of certification. I'm an OO; have worked with multiple FR300's with no problems (when there was internet nearby). I have had one failure with a Nano - last day at a Canadian Nationals I was scoring. It showed as corrupted usb drive; pilot had to open trailer and get the backup and we were a bit late for the dinner. Agree that generally they are very reliable, and good up to world records. The FR300's are inexpensive and work well for the price. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
IGC Flight Recorders using Flarm firmware - New DLL file forvalidating IGC flight data files | Ian Strachan | Soaring | 0 | July 20th 14 07:28 PM |
Flight Data Recorders | Michael Henry[_2_] | Piloting | 26 | September 13th 08 11:11 AM |
Digital airspace data question -- any FAA data gurus out there? | Tuno | Piloting | 2 | December 27th 07 05:06 PM |
Flight Data recorders on a 757 - What data? | Al Dykes | General Aviation | 0 | January 1st 07 05:09 PM |
Inexpensive GPS data loggers | [email protected] | Soaring | 3 | March 2nd 05 08:50 AM |