![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, December 11, 2018 at 9:27:17 AM UTC-5, wrote:
On Tuesday, December 11, 2018 at 8:18:36 AM UTC-5, wrote: On Monday, December 10, 2018 at 8:08:44 PM UTC-5, wrote: No doubt the SSA Rules Committee has their hands full regarding the integration of FAI practices into US contest rules and scoring. Very tough job; thanks Andy, Bif, Hank, David, Rich, and John for your service to the SSA. And thank you Guy Byars for all your pro bono software work to provide Winscore. Understood, the Rules Committee is acting on feedback from the results of the recent SSA’s pilot opinion poll. However, the intent of integrating FAI practices is not clear. I would appreciate the Rules Committee clarifying whether its prime objective is to increase the participation of US competition – OR – is the prime objective to better prepare Team USA for future international competition? Certainly, you would agree these are two distinctly different issues requiring different solutions. UH- My personal philosophy is to put maximum emphasis on safety(of course #1), followed by doing the things that maximize participation, from the entry level to the top level. This understandably can be in conflict with actions that mat favor US Team selection and performance at the WGC. The most recent pilot poll results do not, in my view, agree with my philosophy. The task of the RC is to seek and implement the best trade off between two conflicting objectives. I know that there is a sincere effort on the part of the RC to accomplish this objective. Speaking for myself. UH Polls are very nice and make everyone feel included, but I am not so sure that in turn becomes a mandate. I like uniformity when ever possible. I like playing with the same or similar rules. But in moving to an international rules from Local rules I think you have to start at the beginning. Are the FAI and US goals/priorities the same? Are the physical/structural issues that require a difference? In discussions these can be sorted out - in a poll you get a direction not a mandate. My take is that the pilots polled want to have US rules look more like International and the opportunity to race like international pilots, but I am not so sure it calls for blind adoption. Which by the phased approach seems to be how it is moving. Bravo. Great job RC - keep talking and tweaking... please. WH Bill, US is a tiny island of soaring. 100 times more pilots out there are making improvements. Past SSA government was blind to all changes, regardless 2 US reps in IGC, and was plowing wrong way. Ryszard |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
US Contest Rules Committee Meeting Minutes | [email protected] | Soaring | 7 | December 19th 17 04:48 AM |
SSA Competition Rules Committee Meeting Minutes | [email protected] | Soaring | 11 | December 13th 16 03:40 AM |
Minutes of 2015 USA Rules Committee Meeting Posted | John Godfrey (QT)[_2_] | Soaring | 2 | December 15th 15 10:10 PM |
SSA Competition Rules Meeting Minutes | [email protected] | Soaring | 3 | December 4th 09 08:04 PM |
2005 SSA Rules Committee Meeting Minutes Posted | Ken Kochanski (KK) | Soaring | 1 | December 20th 05 05:38 PM |