A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Lost comm altitude?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 10th 04, 07:40 PM
Gary Drescher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Ron Rosenfeld" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 11:11:33 -0500, Roy Smith wrote:

The Dutchess Four Departure has lost comm instructions which read, "If
radio contact is not established/lost for more than two minutes after
departing, proceed on course and climb to 5000 feet. Ten minutes after
departure, climb to requested altitude/flight level".

Let's say my clearance is "Cleared to HPN via Dutchess Four, V157,
HAARP, direct. Maintain 3000, expect 4000 after 10". If I go lost
comm, do they expect me to climb to 5000, stay there for 10 minutes,
then descend back down to 4000? Or stop my climb at 4000? Or climb to
5000 and stay there (which would presumably leave me WAFDOF).

I'm inclined to think stopping my climb at 4000 makes the most sense,
but one could make arguments in support of any of the alternatives.


I would do exactly as the chart states and not try to second-guess the
reasons. (Except that after ten minutes, to get from 5000 to 4000
obviously requires a descent).


Well, descending when told to climb is itself a kind of second-guessing of
the chart's intent--and to me it waves a rather bright red flag!

--Gary

Certainly if you climbed to 5000 when cleared to 4000, that would also
serve to get ATC's attention, and might lead to sooner establishment of
radio contact.


Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA)



  #2  
Old January 11th 04, 12:17 AM
Ron Rosenfeld
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 19:40:23 GMT, "Gary Drescher"
wrote:

Well, descending when told to climb is itself a kind of second-guessing of
the chart's intent--and to me it waves a rather bright red flag!



How long do you think you would have to climb to get from 5,000' MSL to
4,000' MSL? g

It probably depends in part on your theory of the universe.


Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA)
  #3  
Old January 11th 04, 12:29 AM
Gary Drescher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Ron Rosenfeld" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 19:40:23 GMT, "Gary Drescher"
wrote:

Well, descending when told to climb is itself a kind of second-guessing

of
the chart's intent--and to me it waves a rather bright red flag!


How long do you think you would have to climb to get from 5,000' MSL to
4,000' MSL? g

It probably depends in part on your theory of the universe.


Yup. The mathematician in me wants to regard a descent as just a
negative-rate climb, but the pilot in me balks.

--Gary


Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA)



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Retractable Comm Antenna Ron Wanttaja Home Built 11 September 6th 04 06:59 PM
FS: Soft Comm ATC-4Y 4 place portable intercom Jaysen Underhill Instrument Flight Rules 0 December 11th 03 09:41 PM
GPS Altitude with WAAS Phil Verghese Instrument Flight Rules 42 October 5th 03 12:39 AM
Lost comm - Arrival Michael 182 Instrument Flight Rules 3 July 28th 03 12:04 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.