![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 20:07:27 -0500, "Lurker" wrote:
Flyers, I just want some of your thoughts on this. My plane partner and I went out last night to do some practice instrument approaches. He wore the hood and I was the right-seat safety pilot. ATC was not too busy and it was a nice VFR night. First, after we asked for a practice ILS 24 into KPNE they acknowledged our request and then forgot about us and had us continue flying away from the field for sometime. This continued until I finally asked if they were going to vector us. Either way, approach should have handed you off to the tower. But I am curious - is the approach facility co-located with the airport? For example, is it PNE approach and PNE tower? Or is the PNE field serviced by another nearby approach facility? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Newps wrote: Lurker wrote: Were we second class citizens? Depends. Were you flying a Cherokee? HEY!!!! I resemble that remark. -- Dane, happy owner of a PA32-300 |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dane Spearing wrote:
Were we second class citizens? Depends. Were you flying a Cherokee? HEY!!!! I resemble that remark. -- Dane, happy owner of a PA32-300 On a only slightly related note, I was highly offended yesterday to note that some undeserving slob (read: other than me) won that PA-32-260 that AOPA has been showing around. I mean, REALLY... it's not like I forgot to reup my membership. The guy who won it already has about 9000 hours. He's probably tired of flying already. They ought to let guys like me (well, actually me specifically) win. I'd promise to go fly it quite a bit. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:04:59 -0500, "Mortimer Schnerd, RN"
mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com wrote: On a only slightly related note, I was highly offended yesterday to note that some undeserving slob (read: other than me) won that PA-32-260 that AOPA has been showing around. Me too... There's always next year. -=8^( And I liked the Six so much more than the Commander. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bonehenge wrote:
There's always next year. -=8^( And I liked the Six so much more than the Commander. Me too. I've never flown a Commander but I've got a bunch of time flying a Six to some very nice places. Never a 260 though... always a 300. I understand the 260 actually has more useful load... which is already kind of scary. I used to carry 6 adults, baggage, and diving gear (except for tanks and weight belts) from North Carolina to various spots in the Bahamas (with staging in and out of the Vero Beach/ St. Lucie County area). One hell of a load... one hell of a bird. What did the guy who won the AOPA bird fly? C-130's? He's never gonna be satisfied with a Six. Schmuck. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 20:34:10 -0500, "Mortimer Schnerd, RN"
mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com wrote: What did the guy who won the AOPA bird fly? C-130's? He's never gonna be satisfied with a Six. Schmuck. Maybe he flies Dolphins! G |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mortimer Schnerd, RN wrote:
Bonehenge wrote: There's always next year. -=8^( And I liked the Six so much more than the Commander. Me too. I've never flown a Commander but I've got a bunch of time flying a Six to some very nice places. Never a 260 though... always a 300. I understand the 260 actually has more useful load... which is already kind of scary. I used to carry 6 adults, baggage, and diving gear (except for tanks and weight belts) from North Carolina to various spots in the Bahamas (with staging in and out of the Vero Beach/ St. Lucie County area). One hell of a load... one hell of a bird. What did the guy who won the AOPA bird fly? C-130's? He's never gonna be satisfied with a Six. Schmuck. I fly a -260 with 7 seats. Mine's got a 1556 lb useful load, and I do fly it at max gross. When heavy it is no short field machine, especially when hot and high, but it will in fact lift a lot of people, gas, and stuff. There's simply nothing else out there like it. Fact is, it is pretty much an if it fits through the door you can fly it machine. Unlike the -300, it is virtually impossible to get the CG forward of the forward limit. You really have to work to get it aft of the aft limit (two big guys in the back seat and nobody else but the 180 lb pilot will do it). Had I won the AOPA one, it would have been a hard choice on which to keep. Mine's got a bigger useful load and has the 7 seats I need, plus it is a relatively low time airframe with about 3500 hours. Theirs has some nice goodies in the panel and has been nicely refurbished all over, and is supposedly several knots faster than the 135kts true I get out of mine at 6000'. Guess that's why they put my name back in the hat when they drew it. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 7, 8:07 pm, "Lurker" wrote:
Flyers, I just want some of your thoughts on this. My plane partner and I went out last night to do some practice instrument approaches. He wore the hood and I was the right-seat safety pilot. snipped It was obviously bad ATC service. I have had controllers forget and let me fly through the final course, but they always apologized for it and gave me above average service the second time around. However, I do have to ask how you 'suddenly' ended up 1/2 mile final and way above the glide slope. As soon as you realize you have been given a bum vector, you should query the controller instead of continuing that far into the approach. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd call the Tower Manager and ask him to look into it.
Unless the tape retention has changed they are required to retain the tape(s) for 15 days. They then are rotated back into service Al "Mortimer Schnerd, RN" mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com wrote in message ... Lurker wrote: The tower responds, "I've been waiting for you to contact us" "I'm sorry. Did approach hand us off?" "No...but that doesn't matter...it's your responsibility. You need to realize that there is a problem before you're on a 1/2 mile final." |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
45 days.
Allan9 wrote: I'd call the Tower Manager and ask him to look into it. Unless the tape retention has changed they are required to retain the tape(s) for 15 days. They then are rotated back into service Al |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RNAV vectors | Dan Luke | Instrument Flight Rules | 74 | December 26th 06 10:31 PM |
Vectors over water | paul kgyy | Instrument Flight Rules | 22 | May 4th 05 09:15 PM |
Lost Comms While on Vectors for traffic | O. Sami Saydjari | Instrument Flight Rules | 14 | April 26th 05 10:08 PM |
Approach to an LOM/IAF with PT (not vectors to final) | O. Sami Saydjari | Instrument Flight Rules | 35 | April 13th 04 09:54 PM |
Slam dunk into Janesville | Steven P. McNicoll | Piloting | 0 | July 31st 03 01:08 AM |