![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Royal Navy's 800 Squadron page says "Each RN pilot faced the MiG-29 in
combat and found the Sea Harrier to be a good match for the MiG. Thanks to the Blue Vixen radar the Sea Harrier won every time in beyond visual range engagements and also scored some notable successes when converting to the visual fighting arena." http://www.royal-navy.mod.uk/static/...php3?page=5298 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "KDR" wrote in message m... Royal Navy's 800 Squadron page says "Each RN pilot faced the MiG-29 in combat and found the Sea Harrier to be a good match for the MiG. Thanks to the Blue Vixen radar the Sea Harrier won every time in beyond visual range engagements and also scored some notable successes when converting to the visual fighting arena." http://www.royal-navy.mod.uk/static/...php3?page=5298 This doesn't mean a thing. It was a training exercise, and its the rules the exercise was run under that make/made the difference. These exercises are run as set pieces. Typically with no loser's (due to international relations) with one side doing one thing and the other side is doing something else. Red |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Red" wrote in message om... "KDR" wrote in message m... Royal Navy's 800 Squadron page says "Each RN pilot faced the MiG-29 in combat and found the Sea Harrier to be a good match for the MiG. Thanks to the Blue Vixen radar the Sea Harrier won every time in beyond visual range engagements and also scored some notable successes when converting to the visual fighting arena." http://www.royal-navy.mod.uk/static/...php3?page=5298 This doesn't mean a thing. It was a training exercise, and its the rules the exercise was run under that make/made the difference. These exercises are run as set pieces. Typically with no loser's (due to international relations) with one side doing one thing and the other side is doing something else. Red .... my guess the rules of engagement kept everything subsonic. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
my guess the rules of engagement kept everything subsonic. BRBR
And "a hamburger in another package is still a hamburger" P. C. Chisholm CDR, USN(ret.) Old Phart Phormer Phantom, Turkey, Viper, Scooter and Combat Buckeye Phlyer |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Pechs1" wrote in message ... my guess the rules of engagement kept everything subsonic. BRBR And "a hamburger in another package is still a hamburger" P. C. Chisholm CDR, USN(ret.) Old Phart Phormer Phantom, Turkey, Viper, Scooter and Combat Buckeye Phlyer Try telling that to McDonalds. (Ronald) Red |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
, Dudhorse writes ... my guess the rules of engagement kept everything subsonic. Nah, just fuel constraints on the MiGs ![]() they aren't. -- When you have to kill a man, it costs nothing to be polite. W S Churchill Paul J. Adam MainBoxatjrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/2/03 12:37 PM, in article , "Paul
J. Adam" wrote: In message , Dudhorse writes ... my guess the rules of engagement kept everything subsonic. Nah, just fuel constraints on the MiGs ![]() they aren't. I can't imagine the MiG's being much more fuel limited than the Sea Harrier. The AV-8B's I worked with on KH were HORRIBLE on fuel (0+45) was about all they could handle. --Woody |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , "Doug \"Woody\" and
Erin Beal" writes On 9/2/03 12:37 PM, in article , "Paul J. Adam" wrote: Nah, just fuel constraints on the MiGs ![]() they aren't. I can't imagine the MiG's being much more fuel limited than the Sea Harrier. The AV-8B's I worked with on KH were HORRIBLE on fuel (0+45) was about all they could handle. A MiG-29 wanting to go supersonic long enough to fight might be on a fifteen-minute cycle, if it also wanted to carry a weapon. (Remember the Su-7? Something like six minutes' on burner from full fuel before the tanks are dry. Not down to reserves, _dry_.) The MiG-29 is a dangerously agile point-defence interceptor, and it's got afterburners to further reduce its endurance. The Harriers are short-cycle, but at least they get max thrust dry (and I'm led to believe that carrier fuel reserves are somewhat more stringent than land-based... willing to be corrected) I just don't see MiG-29s having time and fuel to get up to speed, arrange a supersonic intercept on agile opponents, and make it back to base on a routine basis. -- When you have to kill a man, it costs nothing to be polite. W S Churchill Paul J. Adam MainBoxatjrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Rue Britannia!!!!!!!!"
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
av8r wrote:
"Rue Britannia!!!!!!!!" They've probably been waiving the rules again. -- Andrew Chaplin SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO (If you're going to e-mail me, you'll have to get "yourfinger." out.) |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
F15E's trounced by Eurofighters | John Cook | Military Aviation | 193 | April 11th 04 03:33 AM |
RAF Harrier crashes | Jim | Military Aviation | 5 | January 3rd 04 09:28 AM |
Malaysian MiG-29s got trounced by RN Sea Harrier F/A2s in Exercise Flying Fish | KDR | Military Aviation | 29 | October 7th 03 06:30 PM |
Harrier thrust vectoring in air-to-air combat? | Alexandre Le-Kouby | Military Aviation | 11 | September 3rd 03 01:47 AM |
Osprey vs. Harrier | Stephen D. Poe | Military Aviation | 58 | August 18th 03 03:17 PM |