![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Has everyone seen the below? Comments?
Spoken English proficiency might be "easy" to determine during routine meetings, but what about written? Ask the pilot to write an essay? Will the CFI(G) remain anonymous when they "turns in" a pilot to the FSDO for mispronouncing "Antidisestablishmentarianism"? ========================================= http://www.faasafety.gov/spans/noticeView.aspx?nid=4551 FAAST Blast to all CFIs In accordance with FAA Notice N8900.204, which was effective 01/11/2013, we wish to inform you of your responsibility to identify any applicant for a certificate or rating who does not demonstrate the English language skill standards in accordance with 14 CFR regulations and FAA policy. You should report appropriate information about the airman to the nearest FSDO. The FSDO ASI will then take action in accordance with Order 8900.1, Volume 5, Chapter 2, Section 5. Discussion. Title 14 CFR parts 61, 63, and 65 address English language skills currently required for airman certification. Part 61 requires that pilots must be able to read, write, speak, and understand the English language. The responsibility for ensuring applicants meet the English language eligibility requirements is shared by CFIs and GIs, part 141 and non-part 141 aviation pilot training schools, part 142 training centers, TCEs, DPEs, ASIs, and AMEs. Consequences of Failing to Meet the English Language Proficiency Requirements. Unless otherwise authorized by the Administrator, no person may exercise the privileges of an airman certificate issued under part 61, 63, or 65 unless that person meets the English language proficiency requirements of those parts. If a person holding an airman certificate issued under these parts does not meet the English language proficiency requirements, the Administrator will take action to suspend, revoke, or reissue that person’s airman certificate; this action is permitted under Title 49 of the United States Code (49 U.S.C.) § 44709. The complete Notice can be found at http://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/orders_notices and is available on FAASafety.gov at https://www.faasafety.gov/files/noti...N_8900_204.pdf |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JohnDeRosa wrote:
Has everyone seen the below? Comments? Spoken English proficiency might be "easy" to determine during routine meetings, but what about written? Ask the pilot to write an essay? Will the CFI(G) remain anonymous when they "turns in" a pilot to the FSDO for mispronouncing "Antidisestablishmentarianism"? ======================================== http://www.faasafety.gov/spans/noticeView.aspx?nidE51 FAAST Blast to all CFIs In accordance with FAA Notice N8900.204, which was effective 01/11/2013, we wish to inform you of your responsibility to identify any applicant for a certificate or rating who does not demonstrate the English language skill standards in accordance with 14 CFR regulations and FAA policy. You should report appropriate information about the airman to the nearest FSDO. The FSDO ASI will then take action in accordance with Order 8900.1, Volume 5, Chapter 2, Section 5. Discussion. Title 14 CFR parts 61, 63, and 65 address English language skills currently required for airman certification. Part 61 requires that pilots must be able to read, write, speak, and understand the English language. The responsibility for ensuring applicants meet the English language eligibility requirements is shared by CFIs and GIs, part 141 and non-part 141 aviation pilot training schools, part 142 training centers, TCEs, DPEs, ASIs, and AMEs. Consequences of Failing to Meet the English Language Proficiency Requirements. Unless otherwise authorized by the Administrator, no person may exercise the privileges of an airman certificate issued under part 61, 63, or 65 unless that person meets the English language proficiency requirements of those parts. If a person holding an airman certificate issued under these parts does not meet the English language proficiency requirements, the Administrator will take action to suspend, revoke, or reissue that persons airman certificate; this action is permitted under Title 49 of the United States Code (49 U.S.C.) § 44709. The complete Notice can be found at http://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/orders_notices and is available on FAASafety.gov at https://www.faasafety.gov/files/noti...N_8900_204.pdf I guess you could review their RAS postings for both grammatical quality and general sanity :-) The second part may be harder to discern during the winter... Pete |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I discussed this with some fellow CFIs. We figured if a student was having trouble with English, the training would not go well, and we would not be signing them off for a check ride.
So what would be the need to report a student with problems with English to the FAA? It's not an issue until its time to sign the 8710. Besides, I know a few people (pilots) that have problems communicating, whether it be in English, Spanglish, or jibberish. T |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
T wrote:
I discussed this with some fellow CFIs. We figured if a student was having trouble with English, the training would not go well, and we would not be signing them off for a check ride. So what would be the need to report a student with problems with English to the FAA? It's not an issue until its time to sign the 8710. Besides, I know a few people (pilots) that have problems communicating, whether it be in English, Spanglish, or jibberish. T I honestly think that this is more aimed at the puppy mulls in Az and Fl that turn out foreign pilots by the boatload. I've heard some interesting stories of amazingly bad English around some of those places... Pete |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, but all CFIs get caught up with the FAA Notice to do the FAA's job for them.
So sure, I'll sign an 8710 recommending a check ride, and warn the FAA or DPE that this guy may have problems understanding your instructions during a check ride. So why would i sign an 8710 with a known failure as the result? This goes back to the TSA instruction for CFIs to be able to determine that birth certificates or other US identification is not a forgery and we are teaching US citizens and not foreigners. T |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, February 12, 2013 8:37:47 PM UTC-5, T wrote:
Yes, but all CFIs get caught up with the FAA Notice to do the FAA's job for them. This goes beyond checkrides and 8710s. Strictly interpreted, a Flight Review disclosing a language proficiency problem should be reported to the FAA. https://www.faasafety.gov/files/noti...N_8900_204.pdf mentions an Advisory Circular with the criteria for English Language proficiency. While aimed at International students, it does not exclude US citizens. Judgement is called for here. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, February 12, 2013 11:29:39 AM UTC-5, JohnDeRosa wrote:
Has everyone seen the below? Comments? Spoken English proficiency might be "easy" to determine during routine meetings, but what about written? Ask the pilot to write an essay? Will the CFI(G) remain anonymous when they "turns in" a pilot to the FSDO for mispronouncing "Antidisestablishmentarianism"? ========================================= http://www.faasafety.gov/spans/noticeView.aspx?nid=4551 FAAST Blast to all CFIs In accordance with FAA Notice N8900.204, which was effective 01/11/2013, we wish to inform you of your responsibility to identify any applicant for a certificate or rating who does not demonstrate the English language skill standards in accordance with 14 CFR regulations and FAA policy. You should report appropriate information about the airman to the nearest FSDO. The FSDO ASI will then take action in accordance with Order 8900.1, Volume 5, Chapter 2, Section 5. Discussion. Title 14 CFR parts 61, 63, and 65 address English language skills currently required for airman certification. Part 61 requires that pilots must be able to read, write, speak, and understand the English language. The responsibility for ensuring applicants meet the English language eligibility requirements is shared by CFIs and GIs, part 141 and non-part 141 aviation pilot training schools, part 142 training centers, TCEs, DPEs, ASIs, and AMEs. Consequences of Failing to Meet the English Language Proficiency Requirements. Unless otherwise authorized by the Administrator, no person may exercise the privileges of an airman certificate issued under part 61, 63, or 65 unless that person meets the English language proficiency requirements of those parts. If a person holding an airman certificate issued under these parts does not meet the English language proficiency requirements, the Administrator will take action to suspend, revoke, or reissue that person’s airman certificate; this action is permitted under Title 49 of the United States Code (49 U.S.C.) § 44709. The complete Notice can be found at http://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/orders_notices and is available on FAASafety.gov at https://www.faasafety.gov/files/noti...N_8900_204.pdf It would be highly unethical to even start the training of someone who does not meet the English language proficiency requirements. He pays money and certainly should be inform of his potential problems. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I spoke this week to a newly minted CFIG at my home club's board
meeting. He is about as steeped as you can get on analyzing the tea leaves for the latest and greatest FAA "leanings". We agreed that there are several stops along the path of who can spot and resolve issues with non-English proficient students. 1) FSDO - When the candidate applies for a student certificate. If accepted by the FSDO, this implies a "English proficiency" blessing from the FAA. At least in some limited way. Right? Hmmmmm. 2) CFIG - During initial training towards solo. 3) FAA Exam Site - During written exam. This would be a clear stopping point if they fail due to lack of English (written) proficiency. Of course reading a foreign language is easier than either speaking, verbally understanding or writing a foreign language. 4) DPE - During a check ride (oral and practical). The point here is that when my club accepts a student, we are not incurring direct responsibility to determine proficiency or to "turn in" someone who is not. We do have some "moral" responsibility to not lead someone down a path that they will clearly fail. That being said, to cover our bases, we have decided to update our application process to ask potential new members if they are "English Proficient", and if they are US citizens, along with the words, "As required by the Federal Aviation Administration." - John |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just was told by that same CFIG that both an AME and DPE can write
student pilot's certificates. Who knew?? - John |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
American English is a foreign language!
Mike |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Engrish Proficiency ;) | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 18 | February 26th 08 09:12 PM |
Maintaining currency/proficiency after getting my Instrument rating | Gary Drescher | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | March 2nd 06 12:49 PM |
question about instrument proficiency check | Sylvain | Instrument Flight Rules | 14 | October 20th 05 09:11 AM |
Perfect Proficiency Flight | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 39 | August 30th 05 06:06 PM |
Changes in Instrument Proficiency Check Requirements | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 71 | June 10th 04 08:02 PM |