![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My old orbital buffer died, so I am throwing the question to US RAS members to suggest a replacement. I know they run the whole gamut from $29 to $999 - looking for a recommendation for a reliable and cost-effective unit.
Mike |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I get amazing results from the Porter - Cable Model 7424
I've owned the same one for almost 15 years and done many sailplanes, trailers and cars with it on a regular basis. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, February 15, 2013 8:57:02 PM UTC-8, Mike the Strike wrote:
My old orbital buffer died, so I am throwing the question to US RAS members to suggest a replacement. I know they run the whole gamut from $29 to $999 - looking for a recommendation for a reliable and cost-effective unit. Mike $29 or less; Harbor Freight verity 10" works just fine. You actually "can" do harm with the real fancy ones. 6PK |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I second Paul's recommendation on the Porter-Cable 6". Works well and is big enough for most projects but small enough to handle. Supported by the auto community so many choices on pads and bonnets.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, February 16, 2013 8:27:36 AM UTC-7, Tim Taylor wrote:
I second Paul's recommendation on the Porter-Cable 6". Works well and is big enough for most projects but small enough to handle. Supported by the auto community so many choices on pads and bonnets. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, February 16, 2013 1:36:51 PM UTC-7, Boise Pilot wrote:
On Saturday, February 16, 2013 8:27:36 AM UTC-7, Tim Taylor wrote: I second Paul's recommendation on the Porter-Cable 6". Works well and is big enough for most projects but small enough to handle. Supported by the auto community so many choices on pads and bonnets. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 16, 10:27*am, Tim Taylor wrote:
I second Paul's recommendation on the Porter-Cable 6". *Works well and is big enough for most projects but small enough to handle. *Supported by the auto community so many choices on pads and bonnets. Third. I am using it on my cars and motor home and my glider. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, February 16, 2013 7:09:04 PM UTC-7, Joyce Acheson wrote:
http://www.wingsandwheels.com/page44.htm Get the BEST. Joyce, Your kidding right? I think the last thing anyone needs is a dated overpriced machine with limited selection of heads and pads. Further, getting a 3000RPM single speed orbital with an oddly placed on/off switch anywhere near an expensive glider would not be my idea of fun (Might try it on a trailer though). I think before anyone goes recommending an orbital over a DA or PC or rotary it is important to determine what one is trying to accomplish. For a beginner and any type of job other than applying a quickie top coat of wax (Removing oxidation or a cut and buff) a DA is much easier to use than an orbital and there is less chance of harming expensive glider parts. The best and longest lasting results on a finish coat of wax/sealer will always come from a rotary. The trick is to watch the RPM (about 2K is ideal here) and if you find it intimidating practice on the trailer first. Paint manufacturers are an excellent source for care products advise. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, February 17, 2013 8:33:19 AM UTC-6, K wrote:
On Saturday, February 16, 2013 7:09:04 PM UTC-7, Joyce Acheson wrote: http://www.wingsandwheels.com/page44.htm Get the BEST. Joyce, Your kidding right? I think the last thing anyone needs is a dated overpriced machine with limited selection of heads and pads. Further, getting a 3000RPM single speed orbital with an oddly placed on/off switch anywhere near an expensive glider would not be my idea of fun (Might try it on a trailer though). I think before anyone goes recommending an orbital over a DA or PC or rotary it is important to determine what one is trying to accomplish. For a beginner and any type of job other than applying a quickie top coat of wax (Removing oxidation or a cut and buff) a DA is much easier to use than an orbital and there is less chance of harming expensive glider parts. The best and longest lasting results on a finish coat of wax/sealer will always come from a rotary. The trick is to watch the RPM (about 2K is ideal here) and if you find it intimidating practice on the trailer first. Paint manufacturers are an excellent source for care products advise. orbital over a DA or PC Now why would I use a DA (District Attorney, right?) to polish my glider? What about PC, what the hell is that? We don't do Political Correctness here on RAS! My vote goes to the OP (Orbital Polisher) from HF (Harbor Fritenight). I hate acronyms. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Waxing Poetic On Flying | Jay Beckman | Piloting | 4 | October 30th 06 05:17 PM |
Polisher/buffer selection | [email protected] | Soaring | 33 | November 27th 05 02:15 PM |
Polishing & Waxing | Go | Soaring | 8 | March 24th 05 02:15 PM |
Waxing your trailer(New Thread) | Pete Reinhart | Soaring | 2 | March 19th 04 01:14 AM |
Wing Waxing | Marske Flying Wings | Soaring | 2 | September 10th 03 02:59 AM |