![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've got a FAI triangle set up where 2 of the legs are on ridges and the 3rd leg will be a down wind leg. Will it be fastest to climb in a thermal to just high enough to fly back to the ridge at min. sink, or would it be faster to thermal higher and fly back faster? Would I set the MacCready setting to the climb I'm achieving in the thermal or what?
Boggs |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, November 17, 2013 10:57:25 AM UTC-5, Waveguru wrote:
I've got a FAI triangle set up where 2 of the legs are on ridges and the 3rd leg will be a down wind leg. Will it be fastest to climb in a thermal to just high enough to fly back to the ridge at min. sink, or would it be faster to thermal higher and fly back faster? Would I set the MacCready setting to the climb I'm achieving in the thermal or what? Boggs That's probably not as easy as it sounds. Classic McCready theory would say to climb at whatever rate you get at or near the downwind turnpiont, then fly that setting back to the ridge. Not knowing the geometry/geography of the task, I'm assuming this means you would have to approach the ridge from the lee side and cross back over it to get to the windward side to close the triangle? So, you'll be dealing with potentially strong sink and the risk of smacking into the back side of a very hard object, so you'll probably need to need to start by adding significant safety margins to clear the ridge and account for sink. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All turnpoints are on the windward side of a ridge. I would probably mark a thermal coming off the ridge near the start, start the task and go back to the thermal and get high enough to make the second turn. ( in a perfect world ) These are bluffs with flat tops so not a lot of sink downwind of the face.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not totally clear on the geometry, but if you are trying to get to a ridge it is perfectly classic final glide MacCready theory. Set a ridgetop point as your final glide point, then fly to it as if final glide. It is much faster to climb higher in a strong thermal and bomb to the ridge than it is to stop soon and go to the ridge slow. For example, if your best glide is 53 kts, and you're in a 53 kt wind but have 10 kt thermals, going higher and faster will get you there, flying 53 kts will not. Same downwind.
John Cochrane |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You would need a modified MacReady calculation that takes account of the
tail-wind as, unlike the next thermal, the ridge isn't drifting with the wind (or at least you hope it isn't, there's been some pretty extreme weather lately). Likelt result would be somewhere between normal MacReady setting for the rate of climb and best glide speed. At 15:57 17 November 2013, Waveguru wrote: I've got a FAI triangle set up where 2 of the legs are on ridges and the 3r= d leg will be a down wind leg. Will it be fastest to climb in a thermal to= just high enough to fly back to the ridge at min. sink, or would it be fas= ter to thermal higher and fly back faster? Would I set the MacCready setti= ng to the climb I'm achieving in the thermal or what? Boggs |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Surprised there aren't more replies to this. The fastest way through the
air (and hence over the ground) is to fly MacCready cruise speed for the actual climb rate. Assuming you can achieve a faster speed on the ridge than the thermal phase of the flight, then climb until at the correct MacCready speed you can reach the ridge at or above the top. (Halfway up if you are feeling brave, but with a downwind middle leg, a little safety height won't make much difference. At 15:57 17 November 2013, Waveguru wrote: I've got a FAI triangle set up where 2 of the legs are on ridges and the 3rd leg will be a down wind leg. Will it be fastest to climb in a thermal to just high enough to fly back to the ridge at min. sink, or would it be faster to thermal higher and fly back faster? Would I set the MacCready setting to the climb I'm achieving in the thermal or what? Boggs |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No and yes.
At 15:57 17 November 2013, Waveguru wrote: I've got a FAI triangle set up where 2 of the legs are on ridges and the 3r= d leg will be a down wind leg. Will it be fastest to climb in a thermal to= just high enough to fly back to the ridge at min. sink, or would it be fas= ter to thermal higher and fly back faster? Would I set the MacCready setti= ng to the climb I'm achieving in the thermal or what? Boggs |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And the 1% rule applies so on a 100K triangle, I can finish 1K lower than I start, right?
Boggs |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Taxi calculator? (propeller type and speed, aircraft weight, taxi speed) | John Doe[_4_] | General Aviation | 0 | February 3rd 11 10:55 PM |
FAI triangle records speed question | Bruno | Soaring | 1 | June 6th 09 05:05 PM |
500 km Triangle at 306 km/hr in Argentina | Paul Remde | Soaring | 36 | January 3rd 07 08:48 PM |
A fine ridge day in PA - the Ridge Soaring Irregulars ride again | QT | Soaring | 0 | April 6th 06 04:01 PM |
FAI triangle in SEE YOU | Paul Feltz | Soaring | 2 | July 7th 04 07:46 AM |