![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Well, I've now got a grand total of 6 hours in my newly-acquired 1980 Saratoga, and since a couple of people asked, I thought I'd post my experiences. The first big difference that hit me before I got off the ground -- it's a heck of lot harder to taxi than the PA-28. Ok, so it helped a lot when I remembered to turn the yaw damper off (!) but even then, the longer arm on the steering combined with the higher pedal forces made for a rather drunken course to begin with. On take-off, the power was quite a revelation. While my PA-28-151 would happy trundle down the runway, this thing moves, and you really feel the acceleration. Rotation comes at more-or-less the same place on the runway, but at 80kts rather than 65kt. It took me a while to figure out the right trim setting (forget what the book says) so the first couple of times, I had to really hawl it off the ground. Probably not the best technique! Next big problem -- developing a gentle touch on the levers. The throttle, prop and mixture all seem more sensitive, and my ham-hands were making far-too-large adjustments until things start to settle down. In the air, it flies like a somewhat heavier Warrior. Seems to need more rudder in the turns, and it's easier to get off altitude, but after a couple of hours, all that settled down, and I'm reasonably comfortable with the air work. The stall is non-exsitent, and slow flight down to 60kts is easier managable. Touch and goes were fun -- the pattern went around a lot faster than before, and the workload seemed ridiculously high to start with. As usual, things started to slow down, although there's still a lot to do on downwind if you're to get trimmed, GUMPed and ready to cut power by the end of the runway. Landing was, of course, the hardest bit. I never came close to fogetting the gear, as I had my instructor shouting GUMPS! GUMPS! every ten seconds, but I did realize when we did a straight-in approach to a controlled airport how things like that can shorten the accident chain... In the pattern, we aimed for 100kt on downwind, 90kt on base, and then 80kt on final, with the last notch of flaps as we came over the fence. For some reason I just couldn't stop myself getting fast on the base-to-final turn, and then I realized that I was losing sight of the runway behind that long snout, and instinctivly dropping the nose to sneak a peak at my aiming point. As soon as I figured that, and persuaded myself that if the runway was there on downwind, it would probably be there on final, everything got a lot better. Nice early roundout, work the trim in the flare, and while not every one was a greaser, I had no problem keeping the nose way off, and producing at least an acceptable result. We also did some short-field stuff, which surprised me. The plane had no problem getting either in or out of a 2400ft strip with way more than 50% of the runway to spare. In fact, it seemed easier to put in than my Warrior, which confirms my theory that I always landed that too fast!!! Still a lot to do -- instrument stuff, night flight, fully-loaded flight, and adventured with the as-yet not-turned-on autopilot and other toys. Still, I need another 9 hours to keep Avemco happy, so there shouldn't be a problem finding the time. Performance wise, I've been getting about ~162kt in cruise at 4500ft - 5500ft, so it looks like LoPresti earned at least some of that money he took from the last-but-one owner. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike,
I use another memory aid in addition to GUMPS. PUF on final, which stands for: Prop(s) - set for go around Undercarriage - confirm it is down and locked Flaps - final setting for landing This "PUF on final" check saved me from a possible gear up landing (or at least explaining to the instructore why I missed the gear check) during the early days of my retract flying experience. This occurred after an instructor pulled the gear pump circuit breaker while distracting me with something else. I did the GUMPS check on downwind, and placed the gear handle down, the gear dropped but did not fully extend and lock, the noise picked up, I had extra drag, and it seemed like the gear was in fact down. However, I failed to comfirm the green lights. After turning final and doing the "PUF on final" check, I noticed the lights were not on. Another technique taught to prevent the above senario is to leave your hand resting on the gear switch until the down and lock indicators are illuminated. If you don't move your hand off the switch until you confirm the gear is down and locked, you will be less likely to overlook confirming the locked status. Have fun flying Saratoga. Ron "Mike Granby" wrote in message oups.com... Landing was, of course, the hardest bit. I never came close to fogetting the gear, as I had my instructor shouting GUMPS! GUMPS! every ten seconds, but I did realize when we did a straight-in approach to a controlled airport how things like that can shorten the accident chain... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good advice, thanks Ron.
nobody wrote: I use another memory aid in addition to GUMPS. PUF on final, which stands for: Prop(s) - set for go around Undercarriage - confirm it is down and locked Flaps - final setting for landing This "PUF on final" check saved me from a possible gear up landing (or at least explaining to the instructore why I missed the gear check) during the early days of my retract flying experience. This occurred after an instructor pulled the gear pump circuit breaker while distracting me with something else. I did the GUMPS check on downwind, and placed the gear handle down, the gear dropped but did not fully extend and lock, the noise picked up, I had extra drag, and it seemed like the gear was in fact down. However, I failed to comfirm the green lights. After turning final and doing the "PUF on final" check, I noticed the lights were not on. Another technique taught to prevent the above senario is to leave your hand resting on the gear switch until the down and lock indicators are illuminated. If you don't move your hand off the switch until you confirm the gear is down and locked, you will be less likely to overlook confirming the locked status. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rather than resting your hand ON the gear handle, rest it just underneath
it. This will prevent any sudden turbulence from causing you to accidentally rip the gear handle right out of the panel. Although the handles in Pipers are quite hefty, Cessnas and others are not.... and that would REALLY suck! ![]() Jim Another technique taught to prevent the above senario is to leave your hand resting on the gear switch until the down and lock indicators are illuminated. If you don't move your hand off the switch until you confirm the gear is down and locked, you will be less likely to overlook confirming the locked status. Have fun flying Saratoga. Ron |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike, make yourself a spreadsheet with the landing weight and all the
V-speeds. use the formula: V(?)landing weight = [squart root(Wlanding weight/Wgross weight)] * V? gross weight Where W is the weight and ? = best angle, x best rate, y glide stall clean, s stall dirty, so Also keep in mind that V-speeds are different when the gear is up and the gear is down. Some manuals will give you both the gear up and gear down Vx and Vy speeds, most do not. The PA28R-201RT, for example, From the POH, Section Four, Normal Procedures Vy = 97 gear up, flaps up = 79 gear down, flaps up Vx = 79 gear up, flaps up = 73 gear down, flaps up Remember, these are gross weight speeds (approximately 3600 pounds for the Saratoga, right?). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Transition to PA-32R | Mike Granby | Owning | 4 | December 21st 04 08:22 PM |
Recent Changes in the VFR LAX Shoreline Transition Procedure | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 12 | October 9th 04 09:47 PM |
Fulcrum low transition MPG | Pechs1 | Naval Aviation | 0 | October 7th 04 02:14 PM |
GPS and Beyond: The SatNav Transition for aviation | Kevin Horton | Home Built | 1 | September 22nd 04 09:34 PM |
GPS and Beyond: The SatNav Transition for aviation | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | September 22nd 04 01:24 AM |