![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have been down loading real world weather. But, it doesn't match the
actual weather as determined from tuning in the FAA automatic weather stations on the Internet. http://www1.faa.gov/asos/map/map.htm. I've compared it by listening to the ATIS at the airport of FS2002 and comparing it with the actual FAA weather report. It is pretty far off. I've made sure the time at the airport and the time of the weather report were about the same. Anyone else have this problem? John431 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I call it real weird weather
"John431" wrote in message nk.net... I have been down loading real world weather. But, it doesn't match the actual weather as determined from tuning in the FAA automatic weather stations on the Internet. http://www1.faa.gov/asos/map/map.htm. I've compared it by listening to the ATIS at the airport of FS2002 and comparing it with the actual FAA weather report. It is pretty far off. I've made sure the time at the airport and the time of the weather report were about the same. Anyone else have this problem? John431 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't know if this is why MSFS goofs, but METARS aren't necessarily where
ATIS is derived from. At my home field (KBLI), METARs are derived from the ASOS, an automated weather setup, which in the case of KBLI doesn't even broadcast on the radio. You call a phone number to listen to it. Since it is a machine, it can easily goof on clouds and precip. It only sees the patch of sky its sensor is aimed at. Its biggest use is that it is real-time, so you can track trends in things like wind and barometric pressure easily. ATIS recordings are often more acurate because the person in the tower that makes the observations doesn't have the limitations of the machine. But of course the METAR data is what is availiable to the sim, so that's what we get. Another problem can happen if you live right between two reporting stations. I trained out of Lynden WA, and it is smack between Abbottsford and Bellingham. There can be drastic differences between the two, and on a day when the weather was crazy, and I wanted to do a sim-flight out of Lynden, it was 50-50 that the weather in the sim would match what I saw outside. Plus, at least here in the Pacific Northwest, a METAR thats an hour old is many times useless ![]() I personally think the best use for the Real World Weather feature is that it creates a word with varied conditions, without you having manufacture it. Who cares if its not quite whats really outside. Rarely IRL does the weather really match the forecast anyway! "Don Purcella" wrote in message ... I call it real weird weather "John431" wrote in message nk.net... I have been down loading real world weather. But, it doesn't match the actual weather as determined from tuning in the FAA automatic weather stations on the Internet. http://www1.faa.gov/asos/map/map.htm. I've compared it by listening to the ATIS at the airport of FS2002 and comparing it with the actual FAA weather report. It is pretty far off. I've made sure the time at the airport and the time of the weather report were about the same. Anyone else have this problem? John431 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks to all who responded. It confirms what I have been experiencing.
John431 "John431" wrote in message nk.net... I have been down loading real world weather. But, it doesn't match the actual weather as determined from tuning in the FAA automatic weather stations on the Internet. http://www1.faa.gov/asos/map/map.htm. I've compared it by listening to the ATIS at the airport of FS2002 and comparing it with the actual FAA weather report. It is pretty far off. I've made sure the time at the airport and the time of the weather report were about the same. Anyone else have this problem? John431 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have had problems with accurate wind readings in hurricanes above Catagory
2(winds over 100mph). SO at least Isabelle thankfully was a joy for me this time. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flight Simulator 2004 pro 4CDs, Eurowings 2004, Sea Plane Adventures, Concorde, HONG KONG 2004, World Airlines, other Addons, Sky Ranch, Jumbo 747, Greece 2000 [include El.Venizelos], Polynesia 2000, Real Airports, Private Wings, FLITESTAR V8.5 - JEP | vvcd | Home Built | 0 | September 22nd 04 07:16 PM |
Real World test bed for avionics - Megawatts at Delano | MikeremlaP | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | June 6th 04 08:13 PM |
Real World test bed for avionics - Megawatts at Delano | MikeremlaP | Home Built | 0 | June 2nd 04 04:24 AM |
RF interference issue again (esp. for E Drucker and Jim Weir and other RF wizards) | Snowbird | Home Built | 78 | December 3rd 03 09:10 PM |
And they say the automated Weather Station problems "ASOS" are insignificant because only light aircraft need Weather Observations and forecasts... | Roy | Piloting | 4 | July 12th 03 04:03 PM |