![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, according to Peter Garrison's "Aftermath" column in the November
issue of "Flying" you don't need to connect your elevator control! I quote: "the NTSB report does not comment on the fact that a disconnected elevator does not make an ASW-20, or for that matter any other airplane, unflyable. The situation is aerodynamically no different from what occurs when the pilot removes his hand from the stick." I think I'll start leaving the elevators off my ASW-15 now. Imagine how the reduction in drag will improve the performance! Not having to worry about pitch control will certainly cut down on the cockpit workload as well. The benefits are endless! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In this case the NTSB is wrong!
With the elevator disconnected the run of the control rods are not connected to the flying surface. Therefore the mass balance of the system is different to that which was certified, the trim system is also disconnected! Definately *not* the same as just removing the pilots hand from the stick! :-) PS: I'll bet that they don't comment on whether having the mainpin in or not makes the aircraft *flyable* either! Ian "nowhere" wrote in message m... Yes, according to Peter Garrison's "Aftermath" column in the November issue of "Flying" you don't need to connect your elevator control! I quote: "the NTSB report does not comment on the fact that a disconnected elevator does not make an ASW-20, or for that matter any other airplane, unflyable. The situation is aerodynamically no different from what occurs when the pilot removes his hand from the stick." I think I'll start leaving the elevators off my ASW-15 now. Imagine how the reduction in drag will improve the performance! Not having to worry about pitch control will certainly cut down on the cockpit workload as well. The benefits are endless! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 08:06 30 October 2003, Tango4 wrote:
In this case the NTSB is wrong! With the elevator disconnected the run of the control rods are not connected to the flying surface. Therefore the mass balance of the system is different to that which was certified, the trim system is also disconnected! Definately *not* the same as just removing the pilots hand from the stick! Mind the flaps are the major pitch control in the ASW20, the elevator is there more for fine adjustment. A number of pilots have produced 'landings' using the flaps for pitch control in 20's with disconnected elevators. :-) PS: I'll bet that they don't comment on whether having the mainpin in or not makes the aircraft *flyable* either! Strange you should mention that. I understand that a long time ago someone took a Libelle for a local soaring flight and after a while became uncomfortable. After loosening his straps and having a fish around he produced the main pin, the only thing holding the wings together was friction on the spigots. I believe that some very gentle well co-ordinated flying ensued and he landed without incident. 'nowhere' wrote in message om... Yes, according to Peter Garrison's 'Aftermath' column in the November issue of 'Flying' you don't need to connect your elevator control! I quote: 'the NTSB report does not comment on the fact that a disconnected elevator does not make an ASW-20, or for that matter any other airplane, unflyable. The situation is aerodynamically no different from what occurs when the pilot removes his hand from the stick.' I think I'll start leaving the elevators off my ASW-15 now. Imagine how the reduction in drag will improve the performance! Not having to worry about pitch control will certainly cut down on the cockpit workload as well. The benefits are endless! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A number
of pilots have produced 'landings' using the flaps for pitch control in 20's with disconnected elevators. And I have the remains of a 20 in the barn, that was unable to control pitch with the elevator disconnected. There isn't one piece of the ship any larger than 3 feet long. Hook up your controls and then do a Critical Assembly Check. JJ Sinclair |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
..
'nowhere' wrote in message om... Yes, according to Peter Garrison's 'Aftermath' column in the November 7issue of 'Flying' you don't need to connect your elevator control! I quote: 'the NTSB report does not comment on the fact that a disconnected elevator does not make an ASW-20, or for that matter any other airplane, unflyable. This is correct. I personally know of Several -20's and even a PIK-20 (no spoiers) that were flown and successfully landed without elevator control. I tested this mode in a -20C by "locking" the pitch at the stick with tape (that would break should I need it to). It was not pretty, but I towed to 2K ft, released and landed with flaps and spoilers only. Not a huge deal. Keep your wits about you, practice, and you needn't die because of a disabled/disconnected control! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Depends on the glider type. In a Ka6E you will certainly crash. If on
tow, you will kill the tug pilot and then crash yourself. Which part of the phugoid you are in when you hit the ground will play a large part in determining whether your crash is fatal or just very serious. Chris N. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wasn't there a PW that attempted take-off without the main pin (or
whatever it is that keeps the wings stuck on'em) at the World Soaring Championships this past summer? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oh please dear god.....
Don't let that Marske guy tell us all we didn't need tails after all............... Scott |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 10:00 30 October 2003, Andrew Warbrick wrote:
Mind the flaps are the major pitch control in the ASW20, the elevator is there more for fine adjustment. I'd like to see a 20 completing a loop with flaps alone before I accept that oft stated view:-) A spin recovery would be interesting too. John Galloway |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
22 Aug 2004 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | August 24th 04 06:46 AM |
16 Aug 2004 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | August 17th 04 12:37 AM |
AVSIM News Update | Eric Lunston | Simulators | 16 | August 15th 04 04:49 AM |
CBS NEWS - An Idea | Harry Gordon | Piloting | 15 | January 17th 04 01:22 PM |