![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been trying to use duats to file flight plans. The preferred
route from PHL to Toronto CYYZ is ptw, then ptw 320 deg radial to intercept J64 RAV etc. I've tried various formats to enter this radial to a jet route format, but duats doesn't seem to accept it. Any one able to make this type of route work? Stan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... I've been trying to use duats to file flight plans. The preferred route from PHL to Toronto CYYZ is ptw, then ptw 320 deg radial to intercept J64 RAV etc. I've tried various formats to enter this radial to a jet route format, but duats doesn't seem to accept it. Any one able to make this type of route work? Determine what point the PTW R320 intersects J64 and file PTW direct to that point direct to RAV. I don't have a current H-3, but assuming J64 is still a straight line between RAV and RBV, the point of intersection looks like RAV113034, so file PTW..RAV113034..RAV.J64. You could also file PTW..FLOAT..RAV.J64, FLOAT is on V276 and is the RAV114034. Close enough. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I had found FLOAT on the low charts, and filed ptw float rav etc.
The next time, I found SUZIE to be almost exactly on the ptw 320R, and that Suzie was a hi altitude waypoint on j64. And so filed ptw suzie j64 rav... Both times when picking up the clearance, atc gave me "ptw ptw 320R intercept j64 rav...". Not really a problem because as you said, its pretty well the same as filed, but atc both times asked for a readback of the route (after I read back transponder code only). I just like to file the same route atc expects, to minimize chances of mistakes, and extra work/radio callls. If you still think filing to the intercept point identified via the rav radial and distance is the way to do it, I'll try. What I was hoping to find was a simple way to enter ptw ptw320R intercept j64 through duats, and have it accepted when I go to file. That way, I should get "cleared as filed" instead of the whole route given to me by atc. Any regular duat users out there that can shed some light? I tried their 1 800 number but it is no good from Canada. And they didn't respond to my email. thanks for your response Steven Stan On Tue, 24 May 2005 01:25:35 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: wrote in message .. . I've been trying to use duats to file flight plans. The preferred route from PHL to Toronto CYYZ is ptw, then ptw 320 deg radial to intercept J64 RAV etc. I've tried various formats to enter this radial to a jet route format, but duats doesn't seem to accept it. Any one able to make this type of route work? Determine what point the PTW R320 intersects J64 and file PTW direct to that point direct to RAV. I don't have a current H-3, but assuming J64 is still a straight line between RAV and RBV, the point of intersection looks like RAV113034, so file PTW..RAV113034..RAV.J64. You could also file PTW..FLOAT..RAV.J64, FLOAT is on V276 and is the RAV114034. Close enough. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... I had found FLOAT on the low charts, and filed ptw float rav etc. The next time, I found SUZIE to be almost exactly on the ptw 320R, and that Suzie was a hi altitude waypoint on j64. And so filed ptw suzie j64 rav... I make FLOAT to be on the PTW 319R and SUZIE to be on the PTW 315R. FLOAT would be a bit closer to the specified intersection but the difference is insignificant. Since SUZIE is actually on J64 I'd go with it. Both times when picking up the clearance, atc gave me "ptw ptw 320R intercept j64 rav...". Not really a problem because as you said, its pretty well the same as filed, but atc both times asked for a readback of the route (after I read back transponder code only). I just like to file the same route atc expects, to minimize chances of mistakes, and extra work/radio callls. If you still think filing to the intercept point identified via the rav radial and distance is the way to do it, I'll try. What I was hoping to find was a simple way to enter ptw ptw320R intercept j64 through duats, and have it accepted when I go to file. That way, I should get "cleared as filed" instead of the whole route given to me by atc. The ATC flight data processing computer will accept anything it's told to accept. Since this is a preferential route one must assume it's in the computer. The format would be PTW.PTW320..J64.RAV. Note that there is one period between unlike elements (fix.route) and two periods between like elements(route..route or fix..fix). Give that a whirl, if it works your problem's solved. Of course, if it doesn't work, you won't know it the problem was with DUATS or ATC. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
thanks I'll try
Stan The ATC flight data processing computer will accept anything it's told to accept. Since this is a preferential route one must assume it's in the computer. The format would be PTW.PTW320..J64.RAV. Note that there is one period between unlike elements (fix.route) and two periods between like elements(route..route or fix..fix). Give that a whirl, if it works your problem's solved. Of course, if it doesn't work, you won't know it the problem was with DUATS or ATC. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Route Advice? KGEU (Phoenix) -> KEMT (Los Angeles) | Eclipsme | Piloting | 4 | August 13th 04 04:15 AM |
NAS and associated computer system | Newps | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | August 12th 04 05:12 AM |
filing IFR plan for VFR flight conditions | Paul Safran | Instrument Flight Rules | 53 | May 11th 04 03:07 AM |
filing with DUATS | Ditch | Instrument Flight Rules | 20 | January 14th 04 09:38 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |