![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
It is apparently not possible to communicate with you directly, so let me
explain how I got the 1.4 miles of protected airspace on the non-maneuvering side of procedure turn airspace, and apologize for being wrong...the protected airspace is 4.0 miles wide, giving the pilot even less reason to work at tracking the outbound. Back when TERPS was an actual publication with pages rather than an online source, Para 234 included instructions for constructing procedure turn airspace based on max allowed distance. In the instructions for a ten-mile PT, the procedures designer was told to select a point one mile inside of the airspace on the manuevering side, perpendular to the outbound course at the fix. The next step was to select another point, ten miles from the original point but two miles inside of the maneuvering airspace. The designer was then told to swing an arc with a 5 nm radius from the first point and a 6 nm radius from the second point. A line drawn tangent to these two arcs, parallel to the outbound course, defines the edge of the primary protected area on the non-maneuvering side. The primary area gives 1000 ft of vertical clearance...beyond that, the protected airspace vertical protection tapers down to zero over an additional two miles. Can't find the detailed instruction in the online TERPS, but the illustration remains. Bob Gardner |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Gardner" wrote in message ... It is apparently not possible to communicate with you directly, so let me explain how I got the 1.4 miles of protected airspace on the non-maneuvering side of procedure turn airspace, and apologize for being wrong...the protected airspace is 4.0 miles wide, giving the pilot even less reason to work at tracking the outbound. Back when TERPS was an actual publication with pages rather than an online source, Para 234 included instructions for constructing procedure turn airspace based on max allowed distance. In the instructions for a ten-mile PT, the procedures designer was told to select a point one mile inside of the airspace on the manuevering side, perpendular to the outbound course at the fix. The next step was to select another point, ten miles from the original point but two miles inside of the maneuvering airspace. The designer was then told to swing an arc with a 5 nm radius from the first point and a 6 nm radius from the second point. A line drawn tangent to these two arcs, parallel to the outbound course, defines the edge of the primary protected area on the non-maneuvering side. The primary area gives 1000 ft of vertical clearance...beyond that, the protected airspace vertical protection tapers down to zero over an additional two miles. Can't find the detailed instruction in the online TERPS, but the illustration remains. Bob Gardner Bob, this is covered in the Instrument Procedures Handbook FAA-H-8261-1 chapter 5 pages 35 onwards |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob,
The TERPS manual that contains the PT instructions can be found at this website; http://av-info.faa.gov/terps/Directi...260.3_1-18.pdf If you go to page 34 (of 268) you can find the graphic and on page 35 you can find the table that gives the instructions on how to build the PT manually. JPH Bob Gardner wrote: It is apparently not possible to communicate with you directly, so let me explain how I got the 1.4 miles of protected airspace on the non-maneuvering side of procedure turn airspace, and apologize for being wrong...the protected airspace is 4.0 miles wide, giving the pilot even less reason to work at tracking the outbound. Back when TERPS was an actual publication with pages rather than an online source, Para 234 included instructions for constructing procedure turn airspace based on max allowed distance. In the instructions for a ten-mile PT, the procedures designer was told to select a point one mile inside of the airspace on the manuevering side, perpendular to the outbound course at the fix. The next step was to select another point, ten miles from the original point but two miles inside of the maneuvering airspace. The designer was then told to swing an arc with a 5 nm radius from the first point and a 6 nm radius from the second point. A line drawn tangent to these two arcs, parallel to the outbound course, defines the edge of the primary protected area on the non-maneuvering side. The primary area gives 1000 ft of vertical clearance...beyond that, the protected airspace vertical protection tapers down to zero over an additional two miles. Can't find the detailed instruction in the online TERPS, but the illustration remains. Bob Gardner |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I rely on the Summit Aviation CD-ROM...guess they don't provide
everything... Thanks. Bob "JPH" wrote in message news:xC5qe.9693$mC.6960@okepread07... Bob, The TERPS manual that contains the PT instructions can be found at this website; http://av-info.faa.gov/terps/Directi...260.3_1-18.pdf If you go to page 34 (of 268) you can find the graphic and on page 35 you can find the table that gives the instructions on how to build the PT manually. JPH Bob Gardner wrote: It is apparently not possible to communicate with you directly, so let me explain how I got the 1.4 miles of protected airspace on the non-maneuvering side of procedure turn airspace, and apologize for being wrong...the protected airspace is 4.0 miles wide, giving the pilot even less reason to work at tracking the outbound. Back when TERPS was an actual publication with pages rather than an online source, Para 234 included instructions for constructing procedure turn airspace based on max allowed distance. In the instructions for a ten-mile PT, the procedures designer was told to select a point one mile inside of the airspace on the manuevering side, perpendular to the outbound course at the fix. The next step was to select another point, ten miles from the original point but two miles inside of the maneuvering airspace. The designer was then told to swing an arc with a 5 nm radius from the first point and a 6 nm radius from the second point. A line drawn tangent to these two arcs, parallel to the outbound course, defines the edge of the primary protected area on the non-maneuvering side. The primary area gives 1000 ft of vertical clearance...beyond that, the protected airspace vertical protection tapers down to zero over an additional two miles. Can't find the detailed instruction in the online TERPS, but the illustration remains. Bob Gardner |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Bob Gardner wrote: I rely on the Summit Aviation CD-ROM...guess they don't provide everything... How current is your Summit CD? Mine shows Paragraph 234, the graphic, and the three tables for construction area, depending on altitude. The three different sizes, depending on altitude, were added in the past five, or so, years. Another thing to keep in mind, just like with holding pattern crtieria (a different handbook, also in Summit) is that where the procedure turn is a VHF fix, the fix error could already chip away at the margins, so you might not quite be where you think you should be when starting a procedure turn under those circumstances. Then, there is the ever-present issue of FAA policy directives that are not reflected in handbooks that are not "spot current." For instance, in the holding pattern crtieria there is a selection table for GPS (RNAV) holding, but that was challenged at the Aeronatucal Charting Forum about three years ago as being an untested selection process that presumed positive course guidance throughout an RNAV holding pattern. Only some high-end LNAV platforms can do that; others must fly outbound in the traditional manner using dead reckoning. As a result of that ACF issue paper the FAA made simulator tests, which confirmed the industry objection. Thus, by policy letter, that GPS selection table can no longer be used for RNAV holding patterns. Thanks. Bob "JPH" wrote in message news:xC5qe.9693$mC.6960@okepread07... Bob, The TERPS manual that contains the PT instructions can be found at this website; http://av-info.faa.gov/terps/Directi...260.3_1-18.pdf If you go to page 34 (of 268) you can find the graphic and on page 35 you can find the table that gives the instructions on how to build the PT manually. JPH Bob Gardner wrote: It is apparently not possible to communicate with you directly, so let me explain how I got the 1.4 miles of protected airspace on the non-maneuvering side of procedure turn airspace, and apologize for being wrong...the protected airspace is 4.0 miles wide, giving the pilot even less reason to work at tracking the outbound. Back when TERPS was an actual publication with pages rather than an online source, Para 234 included instructions for constructing procedure turn airspace based on max allowed distance. In the instructions for a ten-mile PT, the procedures designer was told to select a point one mile inside of the airspace on the manuevering side, perpendular to the outbound course at the fix. The next step was to select another point, ten miles from the original point but two miles inside of the maneuvering airspace. The designer was then told to swing an arc with a 5 nm radius from the first point and a 6 nm radius from the second point. A line drawn tangent to these two arcs, parallel to the outbound course, defines the edge of the primary protected area on the non-maneuvering side. The primary area gives 1000 ft of vertical clearance...beyond that, the protected airspace vertical protection tapers down to zero over an additional two miles. Can't find the detailed instruction in the online TERPS, but the illustration remains. Bob Gardner |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Poor research on my part. At a glance, the presentation didn't look like
what I had seen in the past, and I dismissed it. But my original point is valid...there is a ton of protected airspace on the non-maneuvering side. Bob Gardner wrote in message ... Bob Gardner wrote: I rely on the Summit Aviation CD-ROM...guess they don't provide everything... How current is your Summit CD? Mine shows Paragraph 234, the graphic, and the three tables for construction area, depending on altitude. The three different sizes, depending on altitude, were added in the past five, or so, years. Another thing to keep in mind, just like with holding pattern crtieria (a different handbook, also in Summit) is that where the procedure turn is a VHF fix, the fix error could already chip away at the margins, so you might not quite be where you think you should be when starting a procedure turn under those circumstances. Then, there is the ever-present issue of FAA policy directives that are not reflected in handbooks that are not "spot current." For instance, in the holding pattern crtieria there is a selection table for GPS (RNAV) holding, but that was challenged at the Aeronatucal Charting Forum about three years ago as being an untested selection process that presumed positive course guidance throughout an RNAV holding pattern. Only some high-end LNAV platforms can do that; others must fly outbound in the traditional manner using dead reckoning. As a result of that ACF issue paper the FAA made simulator tests, which confirmed the industry objection. Thus, by policy letter, that GPS selection table can no longer be used for RNAV holding patterns. Thanks. Bob "JPH" wrote in message news:xC5qe.9693$mC.6960@okepread07... Bob, The TERPS manual that contains the PT instructions can be found at this website; http://av-info.faa.gov/terps/Directi...260.3_1-18.pdf If you go to page 34 (of 268) you can find the graphic and on page 35 you can find the table that gives the instructions on how to build the PT manually. JPH Bob Gardner wrote: It is apparently not possible to communicate with you directly, so let me explain how I got the 1.4 miles of protected airspace on the non-maneuvering side of procedure turn airspace, and apologize for being wrong...the protected airspace is 4.0 miles wide, giving the pilot even less reason to work at tracking the outbound. Back when TERPS was an actual publication with pages rather than an online source, Para 234 included instructions for constructing procedure turn airspace based on max allowed distance. In the instructions for a ten-mile PT, the procedures designer was told to select a point one mile inside of the airspace on the manuevering side, perpendular to the outbound course at the fix. The next step was to select another point, ten miles from the original point but two miles inside of the maneuvering airspace. The designer was then told to swing an arc with a 5 nm radius from the first point and a 6 nm radius from the second point. A line drawn tangent to these two arcs, parallel to the outbound course, defines the edge of the primary protected area on the non-maneuvering side. The primary area gives 1000 ft of vertical clearance...beyond that, the protected airspace vertical protection tapers down to zero over an additional two miles. Can't find the detailed instruction in the online TERPS, but the illustration remains. Bob Gardner |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Bob Gardner wrote: Poor research on my part. At a glance, the presentation didn't look like what I had seen in the past, and I dismissed it. But my original point is valid...there is a ton of protected airspace on the non-maneuvering side. No doubt that is the case for light aircraft. But, not necessarily so for jets. For many years the AIM said procedure turn entry and maneuvers could be done as high as 250 knots, IAS. When it was demonstrated to them that loss of containment could occur in the entry area at certain angles and adverse tail wind components, they dropped the max speed to 200. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|