![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One of my students asked me a question the other day that I have been unable
to answer. Many instrument approaches are labeled with a letter following the primary name and the letter indicates that the final approach course is not lined up (beyond 30 degrees) with any runway, and that a circling approach is required. For example: VOR-A. That said, what is the difference between VOR-A, VOR-B, VOR-C, etc? Does the letter have any additional significance? Why, at some airports is there a VOR-B or VOR-C but no VOR-A? Is it because there used to be a VOR-A and it was decommissioned? Thanks, Russ MacDonald, CFII |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The "A " suffix is applied to the first approach generated for that city
name. "B" is for the second approach for that city name. It is not by airport, but by city name. "Russ MacDonald" wrote in message news:tJV6f.11984$gF4.4699@trnddc07... One of my students asked me a question the other day that I have been unable to answer. Many instrument approaches are labeled with a letter following the primary name and the letter indicates that the final approach course is not lined up (beyond 30 degrees) with any runway, and that a circling approach is required. For example: VOR-A. That said, what is the difference between VOR-A, VOR-B, VOR-C, etc? Does the letter have any additional significance? Why, at some airports is there a VOR-B or VOR-C but no VOR-A? Is it because there used to be a VOR-A and it was decommissioned? Thanks, Russ MacDonald, CFII |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article tJV6f.11984$gF4.4699@trnddc07,
"Russ MacDonald" wrote: One of my students asked me a question the other day that I have been unable to answer. Many instrument approaches are labeled with a letter following the primary name and the letter indicates that the final approach course is not lined up (beyond 30 degrees) with any runway, and that a circling approach is required. For example: VOR-A. That said, what is the difference between VOR-A, VOR-B, VOR-C, etc? Does the letter have any additional significance? Why, at some airports is there a VOR-B or VOR-C but no VOR-A? Is it because there used to be a VOR-A and it was decommissioned? There is no significance other than the order the approaches were first published. They start at A for the first circling approach at an airport, and work their way through the alphabet. Some airports have a bunch of them; LGA has an LDA-A, VOR/DME-E, VOR-F, VOR-DME/G, and VOR-DME/H. Presumably at some time there were B, C, and D approaches which have since been revoked. BTW, it's not just mis-alignment between the FAC and the runway. An approach will also not get straight-in minimums if the descent profile is too steep (IIRC, 400 ft/nm). Compare and contrast, for example, the VOR-A and the VOR/DME-24 at POU. Exactly the same FAC, but the DME approach gets you a couple hundred feet lower at the FAF, so it qualifies for straight-in. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Roy Smith wrote: approach will also not get straight-in minimums if the descent profile is too steep (IIRC, 400 ft/nm). Correct, except for CAT D, the limit is 350 feet per mile. (Used to be 400 like A,B, and C.) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Russ MacDonald" wrote in message news:tJV6f.11984$gF4.4699@trnddc07... One of my students asked me a question the other day that I have been unable to answer. Many instrument approaches are labeled with a letter following the primary name and the letter indicates that the final approach course is not lined up (beyond 30 degrees) with any runway, and that a circling approach is required. For example: VOR-A. It's not just the alignment of the FAC, if the approach gradient is too steep or the runway is indistinct there will be no straight-in minima. That said, what is the difference between VOR-A, VOR-B, VOR-C, etc? Does the letter have any additional significance? Why, at some airports is there a VOR-B or VOR-C but no VOR-A? Is it because there used to be a VOR-A and it was decommissioned? The alphabetical suffix for circling procedures is not duplicated at airports with identical city names within the same state. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK maybe somebody can answer this one...on the NOAA plates near the top
of the page there is a little three or four digit number that corresponds to the airport...anybody know where I can find a list of airport names that match the numbers? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GPS approach question | Matt Whiting | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | August 29th 08 03:54 AM |
Contact approach question | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 114 | January 31st 05 06:40 PM |
Approach Plates on PDA (PIREP) | Stan Prevost | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | December 18th 04 04:21 AM |
"Cleared Straight-In Runway X; Report Y Miles Final" | Jim Cummiskey | Piloting | 86 | August 16th 04 06:23 PM |
Where is the FAF on the GPS 23 approach to KUCP? | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 36 | April 16th 04 12:41 PM |