![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Arrived at around 2200 last night IFR at our local field, and heard a pilot
doing position reports on the CTAF. I spotted the traffic (night touch and goes), and also announced. As I established on final, she announced a full stop, and then proceeded to land and taxi the whole length of the mile long runway to go to her hangar. Of course, this necessitated a go around, since there was no way I could go slow enough to avoid landing while she taxied down the whole runway. Then, as I was turning base, another slow mover said he was on a three mile final to the runway. Even though I had already turned base, was inside him, and going a lot faster, I elected to extend the downwind, since he had announced his intention to land even though he knew I was on a tight base leg. I guess I was taught to exit the runway as expeditiously as possible at uncontrolled fields, and also that planes on base or closer to the airport had the right of way. Isn't this supposed to be common courtesy, or am I being overly critical and self righteous? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Viperdoc" wrote:
Then, as I was turning base, another slow mover said he was on a three mile final to the runway. Even though I had already turned base, was inside him, and going a lot faster, I elected to extend the downwind, since he had announced his intention to land even though he knew I was on a tight base leg. I don't understand this one. He's 2 miles behind you and slower. What possible problem could there have been? Why not just continue your pattern and land normally? I also don't understand what you mean when you say you had already turned base, but then elected to extend downwind. I guess I was taught to exit the runway as expeditiously as possible at uncontrolled fields Controlled ones too. and also that planes on base or closer to the airport had the right of way. In what way did the guy on 3 mile final violate this? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry, to clarify, I had turned base and had him in sight, and announced the
same. He said "I'm on a three mile final and landing", and the tone of his voice made it very clear that he did not intend to give way or slow down. I turned out of base back to downwind and followed him in- it didn't seem worth arguing over the radio or creating a traffic conflict, and I didn't want to have him go around if it was too close, as had just happened to me. I also forgot to mention that the first plane then announced she was crossing the runway as he came down final. He called "where, where are you crossing the runway?" Overall, he sounded kind of stressed and overloaded, and it simply wasn't worth arguing over the air. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Viperdoc" wrote in message
... I guess I was taught to exit the runway as expeditiously as possible at uncontrolled fields, and also that planes on base or closer to the airport had the right of way. Isn't this supposed to be common courtesy, or am I being overly critical and self righteous? AIM 4-3-20a says "Exit the runway without delay at the first available taxiway", so that's more than just a matter of courtesy. On the other hand, you were taught incorrectly about landing priority. FAR 91.113g gives the right of way to the aircraft on final approach (a lower-altitude aircraft on base is not supposed to cut in front of one on final if there's a conflict). If you had plenty of time to land before the other aircraft came close, then there was no conflict and you could have proceeded. But if there was any doubt, you did the right thing by extending your downwind. In either case, the pilot on final did nothing improper. --Gary |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree in principle with your statement. However, the other pilot was VFR
and flying a practice ILS to the landing runway. His "final" was about 8 miles in length as he flew the ILS. He was in a Warrior and I was flying a Baron, so there was a significant difference in speed. While I easily could have turned in and landed well before him, why make things tight and more stressful for him at night during a practice approach? I decided to not force the issue and extended the downwind (a long way, since he was relatively so slow). It was very clear from the tone of his voice and his response to the other pilot's runway crossing that he was getting pretty stressed. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Viperdoc" wrote in message
... I agree in principle with your statement. However, the other pilot was VFR and flying a practice ILS to the landing runway. His "final" was about 8 miles in length as he flew the ILS. He was in a Warrior and I was flying a Baron, so there was a significant difference in speed. While I easily could have turned in and landed well before him, why make things tight and more stressful for him at night during a practice approach? I decided to not force the issue and extended the downwind (a long way, since he was relatively so slow). It was very clear from the tone of his voice and his response to the other pilot's runway crossing that he was getting pretty stressed. Yup, sounds like you did what was prudent and courteous. --Gary |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yup, sounds like you did what was prudent and courteous.
Agreed. You probably could have squeezed in ahead of the Warrior without much hassle but considering his tone on the radio I think your extending downwind to slot in behind him was a good call. As for the knucklehead that taxied down the runway necessitating a go-around, I'd have had a tough time not saying anything on the frequency about the lack of courtesy. I usually just bitch on the intercom when something like this happens : ) If it's such an egregious show of stupidity that I just can't help myself I'll have a word with the offender on the ground and not on the radio. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the input. I try to not be critical of other pilots, since I have
done more than my own share of bonehead moves. On the other hand it's hard to not get frustrated, since we had just flown nearly three hours in night IMC, dodging thunderstorms, picked up ice, got bounced around, etc, only to have to go around because someone decided to taxi full length even knowing someone was on final right behind her. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Viperdoc wrote:
Arrived at around 2200 last night IFR at our local field, and heard a pilot doing position reports on the CTAF. I spotted the traffic (night touch and goes), and also announced. As I established on final, she announced a full stop, and then proceeded to land and taxi the whole length of the mile long runway to go to her hangar. At what airport did this occur? I wanted to look at an airport diagram to see what options she had. -- Peter |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Isn't this supposed to be common courtesy, or am I being overly critical and
self righteous? It is related to poor instruction that we see more common these days. Instructors are supposed to include "judgement" training in their syllabus. Common sense is something that cannot be taught. My observation is that there is both a lack of judgement and common sense among new pilots. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Campbell Field Fly-In (9VG)! Oct. 15-16, 2005. Weirwood, Virginia. | [email protected] | Home Built | 0 | October 7th 05 10:26 PM |
Campbell Field Fly-In (9VG)! Oct. 15-16, 2005. Weirwood, Virginia. | [email protected] | General Aviation | 0 | October 7th 05 10:23 PM |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
Washington DC airspace closing for good? | tony roberts | Piloting | 153 | August 11th 05 12:56 AM |
Did the Germans have the Norden bombsight? | Cub Driver | Military Aviation | 106 | May 12th 04 07:18 AM |