![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My club just got a very nicely equipped Bonanza with a King KFC-200
A/P system installed (along with a CNX-80 GPS). I think I've got most of it figured out, but yesterday something happend which I didn't understand. The active leg in the GPS was a course of about 230, with a stiff wind from the south. I was about 2.5 miles right of course, and 30 miles from the next waypoint. I put the course pointer on 230, the heading bug on 190, and selected FD, HDG, ALT, and AP-ON, and watched the cross-track error on the GPS; it was decreasing slowly, so I figured I had a nice shallow intercept angle set up. I then hit the NAV button. The NAV and ARM lights came on, as expected. Eventually, Otto intercepted the desired course (as indicated by the GPS XTE going to zero and the HSI course deviation bar centering. What I expected to happen at this point was that the HDG and ARM lights would go out and the CPLD light would come on, and Otto would start tracking the course. Instead, it just stayed in heading mode with ARM lit up, slowly taking us left of course. When I recycled the NAV button, it instantly went into coupled mode and started tracking. Is my understanding of how ARM/CPLD works in error? Is it possible that the very shallow intercept angle I had set up (just a couple of degrees) had somehow fooled the coupling trigger circuitry? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Have you read the POH supplement?
"Roy Smith" wrote in message ... | My club just got a very nicely equipped Bonanza with a King KFC-200 | A/P system installed (along with a CNX-80 GPS). I think I've got most | of it figured out, but yesterday something happend which I didn't | understand. | | The active leg in the GPS was a course of about 230, with a stiff wind | from the south. I was about 2.5 miles right of course, and 30 miles | from the next waypoint. I put the course pointer on 230, the heading | bug on 190, and selected FD, HDG, ALT, and AP-ON, and watched the | cross-track error on the GPS; it was decreasing slowly, so I figured I | had a nice shallow intercept angle set up. I then hit the NAV | button. The NAV and ARM lights came on, as expected. | | Eventually, Otto intercepted the desired course (as indicated by the | GPS XTE going to zero and the HSI course deviation bar centering. | What I expected to happen at this point was that the HDG and ARM | lights would go out and the CPLD light would come on, and Otto would | start tracking the course. Instead, it just stayed in heading mode | with ARM lit up, slowly taking us left of course. When I recycled the | NAV button, it instantly went into coupled mode and started tracking. | | Is my understanding of how ARM/CPLD works in error? Is it possible | that the very shallow intercept angle I had set up (just a couple of | degrees) had somehow fooled the coupling trigger circuitry? | | |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Macklin" wrote:
Have you read the POH supplement? Yes. Do you think I got this far by just randomly pushing buttons? :-) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Have you read the POH supplement?
Yes. Do you think I got this far by just randomly pushing buttons? :-) That's usually how I do it. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You never know. But in order to capture, the system must be
armed with the CDI a full scale and the intercept angle/rate must be such that a clear intercept happens. This generally requires a 30 degree angle. This is from memory, I don't have the manuals at this time for review. "Roy Smith" wrote in message ... | "Jim Macklin" wrote: | | Have you read the POH supplement? | | Yes. Do you think I got this far by just randomly pushing buttons? :-) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Smith wrote:
Is my understanding of how ARM/CPLD works in error? If it is, then so is mine - and I've used several different flavors of KFC autopilots. Is it possible that the very shallow intercept angle I had set up (just a couple of degrees) had somehow fooled the coupling trigger circuitry? Of course it's possible. Neither one of us knows how that circuitry works, but I can certainly imagine some designs that would be fooled that way. However, since King keeps those service manuals expensive, we have no way to find out. My question is - how far did you let the XTE get in the other direction before you recycled the NAV button? You might simply not have waited long enough. All it would take is one comparator out of whack. Michael |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Michael" wrote:
My question is - how far did you let the XTE get in the other direction before you recycled the NAV button? You might simply not have waited long enough. All it would take is one comparator out of whack. That's certainly possible. I didn't let it get very far. Enough that it was obvious to me that it had gone past center, but less than one dot out on the HSI. I don't recall what the GPS XTE was, but I'd don't think the A/P is aware of the XTE directly, just the HSI deviation. I love playing with this stuff. It makes me feel like I'm back in the 1980's playing with analog computers in the control systems lab :-) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy,
You need to always be sure to give the aircraft a heading that will actually provide an intercept else it will never go from ARM to CPLD. Sounds like there is a small offset in that detector given that you got a couple soon as you cycled NAV. It is very rate sensitive... it will go to CPLD when the needle is not nearly centered if the needle is moving fast toward the center. If the needle is moving slowly, it will have to be centered or even a bit past center. The reason is that the crosswind integrator is only sort of shorted out during this ARM- capture phase of flight. When you go to CPLD, the yellow arrow becomes the course datum. Note that you can even intercept from FD-APR-ARM mode--wing leveling only. Heading does not have to be selected to effect the coupling--but the airplane needs to be aimed so as to acheive an intercept. The tip of the day is to always use APR mode when coupling to your GPS, even enroute. NAV mode is dumbed down considerably to make crossing over VOR stations less traumatic. APR doesn't suffer that, and since the GPS course needle is rock solid APR works great with sharp, precise coupling. You can fly a T shaped GPS approach without ever decoupling it-- just feed the new headings in as cued by the cnx-80. There's a lot to learn about the KFC-200. Maybe the POH smart- asses know what it does when the HSI is failed: answer is that it will either cancel everything or just ignore the heading bug, depending on how it's wired. Most cancel everything if heading reference is lost and any mode requiring heading is selected. But you can turn FD and ALT modes back on and it will wing-level at a constant altitude which can be very useful if you are trying to figure out what to do after a gyro failure. Explore this by pulling out the HSI breaker. Have you completely figured out the pitch modes? Bill Hale BPPP instructor. Roy Smith wrote: My club just got a very nicely equipped Bonanza with a King KFC-200 A/P system installed (along with a CNX-80 GPS). I think I've got most of it figured out, but yesterday something happend which I didn't understand. The active leg in the GPS was a course of about 230, with a stiff wind from the south. I was about 2.5 miles right of course, and 30 miles from the next waypoint. I put the course pointer on 230, the heading bug on 190, and selected FD, HDG, ALT, and AP-ON, and watched the cross-track error on the GPS; it was decreasing slowly, so I figured I had a nice shallow intercept angle set up. I then hit the NAV button. The NAV and ARM lights came on, as expected. Eventually, Otto intercepted the desired course (as indicated by the GPS XTE going to zero and the HSI course deviation bar centering. What I expected to happen at this point was that the HDG and ARM lights would go out and the CPLD light would come on, and Otto would start tracking the course. Instead, it just stayed in heading mode with ARM lit up, slowly taking us left of course. When I recycled the NAV button, it instantly went into coupled mode and started tracking. Is my understanding of how ARM/CPLD works in error? Is it possible that the very shallow intercept angle I had set up (just a couple of degrees) had somehow fooled the coupling trigger circuitry? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill" wrote:
If the needle is moving slowly, it will have to be centered or even a bit past center. Yeah, it sounds like that's exactly what happened. I'll have to set up the same scenario again the next time I'm in the plane and let it go a bit further to see what happens. Note that you can even intercept from FD-APR-ARM mode--wing leveling only. Heading does not have to be selected to effect the coupling--but the airplane needs to be aimed so as to acheive an intercept. That makes sense. The arm/couple circuitry is looking at the deviation bar. It doesn't know if the bar is moving because you pointed the plane in the right direction or because the A/P driven by the heading bug did the same thing. Is suspect you could even get it to go from ARM to CPLD by moving the course pointer so as to make the deviation bar center. The tip of the day is to always use APR mode when coupling to your GPS, even enroute. NAV mode is dumbed down considerably to make crossing over VOR stations less traumatic. APR doesn't suffer that, and since the GPS course needle is rock solid APR works great with sharp, precise coupling. You can fly a T shaped GPS approach without ever decoupling it-- just feed the new headings in as cued by the cnx-80. Cool, I'll have to try that. I assume you mean "feed it new courses", though, right? There's a lot to learn about the KFC-200. Maybe the POH smart- asses know what it does when the HSI is failed: answer is that it will either cancel everything or just ignore the heading bug, depending on how it's wired. Most cancel everything if heading reference is lost and any mode requiring heading is selected. But you can turn FD and ALT modes back on and it will wing-level at a constant altitude which can be very useful if you are trying to figure out what to do after a gyro failure. Explore this by pulling out the HSI breaker. I will have to do that too. Have you completely figured out the pitch modes? You mean the one that suddenly puts the airplane into a 3000 FPM dive? Yes, I've got that one figured out :-) But, seriously, I understand altitude hold, and the UP/DOWN rocker switch doing the 600 FPM climb/descent thing as long as you hold it. I'm still working on getting the knack the of using CWS to change pitch, and getting it to fly a coupled ILS, but I think one more flight and I'll have that nailed. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Roy Smith wrote: "Bill" wrote: If the needle is moving slowly, it will have to be centered or even a bit past center. Yeah, it sounds like that's exactly what happened. I'll have to set up the same scenario again the next time I'm in the plane and let it go a bit further to see what happens. Note that you can even intercept from FD-APR-ARM mode--wing leveling only. Heading does not have to be selected to effect the coupling--but the airplane needs to be aimed so as to acheive an intercept. That makes sense. The arm/couple circuitry is looking at the deviation bar. It doesn't know if the bar is moving because you pointed the plane in the right direction or because the A/P driven by the heading bug did the same thing. Is suspect you could even get it to go from ARM to CPLD by moving the course pointer so as to make the deviation bar center. The tip of the day is to always use APR mode when coupling to your GPS, even enroute. NAV mode is dumbed down considerably to make crossing over VOR stations less traumatic. APR doesn't suffer that, and since the GPS course needle is rock solid APR works great with sharp, precise coupling. You can fly a T shaped GPS approach without ever decoupling it-- just feed the new headings in as cued by the cnx-80. Cool, I'll have to try that. I assume you mean "feed it new courses", though, right? Yes that's what I meant. With the yellow d-bar. There's a lot to learn about the KFC-200. Maybe the POH smart- asses know what it does when the HSI is failed: answer is that it will either cancel everything or just ignore the heading bug, depending on how it's wired. Most cancel everything if heading reference is lost and any mode requiring heading is selected. But you can turn FD and ALT modes back on and it will wing-level at a constant altitude which can be very useful if you are trying to figure out what to do after a gyro failure. Explore this by pulling out the HSI breaker. I will have to do that too. Have you completely figured out the pitch modes? You mean the one that suddenly puts the airplane into a 3000 FPM dive? Yes, I've got that one figured out :-) But, seriously, I understand altitude hold, and the UP/DOWN rocker switch doing the 600 FPM climb/descent thing as long as you hold it. I'm still working on getting the knack the of using CWS to change pitch, and getting it to fly a coupled ILS, but I think one more flight and I'll have that nailed. The easy way to remember this: If the ALT light is OFF, both the rocker and the CWS button control Pitch ATTitude. Not specifically annunciated. When U let up the rocker or cws, the airplane will hold the new pitch ATTitude at that moment. If ALT is ON, both the button and cws hold the new ALTitude when released. The rocker slews the airplane to a new ALT. Mostly useful when receiving new altimeter settings The high taste way of changing altitude is to use the controls in the ATT mode, leveling the pitch before engaging ALT. That way there will be no altitude dipping or overshooting. I wrote several articles about this for the ABS magazine as there is big confusion on these points. Bill Hale BPPP instructor |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Operation Brother's Keeper preparing for Rita | Jim Burns | Owning | 1 | September 23rd 05 12:59 AM |
Operation Brother's Keeper preparing for Rita | Jim Burns | Piloting | 1 | September 23rd 05 12:59 AM |
Trying to Fly | AliR | Piloting | 33 | May 9th 05 12:00 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |