![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My transponder installation instructions suggest to place the antenna
over 6 feet away from human body to keep the radiation away. I have a composite fuselage and use an aluminum disc with the standard quarter wave antenna. If I place the antenna and disc below me so the antenna is on the side of the disc away from the body but not 6 feet away, is that OK? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Makes no sense to me. I've never seen anything in any transponder book about
antenna mounting with regard to RF personnel hazards. Any reasonable danger zone would be much less than 6 feet. To answer the question, mounting the antenna straight below you so you are in one of the nulls of a quarter wave ground plane antenna would reduce exposure a lot (a factor of 100 or so is sometimes used for other purposes). The average power output from a transponder is variable according to how many interrogators it is replying to at any one time, and what code it is replying with. Even assuming an environment like Oklahoma City, where there are 20 or so interrogators running, thanks to the FAA training academy, the airport, the air force base, and maybe other stuff. The frequency in use is 1030/1090mhz. Assume 100 Watts peak power and a 1:1000 duty cycle for each interrogator. The average power would still be only around 2 Watts. The antenna gain is a maximum of +2 dBi. That gives a power density at 2 meters (~6 feet) of 2W/(4*pi*(200cm)^2)=4 microWatts/cm^2. That's one 250th of what's considered safe. (~1MilliWatt/cm^2) As a comparison, your cell phone is close, in both power and frequency, yet you think nothing of pressing it against your brain, and talking for extended periods. These are back of the envelope calcs, and I don't guarantee them even a little, but if I were to go flyin' with you when your airplane is done, The transponder would be on page 4 of my list of things I'd worry about... wrote in message oups.com... My transponder installation instructions suggest to place the antenna over 6 feet away from human body to keep the radiation away. I have a composite fuselage and use an aluminum disc with the standard quarter wave antenna. If I place the antenna and disc below me so the antenna is on the side of the disc away from the body but not 6 feet away, is that OK? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for your reply. Appreciate the length you went to.
My plane is already flying since 2004 but am thinking of moving the transponder antenna from under the main wing closer to the front to cut down on the cable length/weight and have a clearer shot at ATC with the transponder and probably get more radiated power out of it due to shorter cable. The transponder is rated at 200 watts. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SQ2000 canard http://www.abri.com/sq2000 On Mar 10, 9:08 pm, "Ron Webb" wrote: ...... but if I were to go flyin' with you when your airplane is done, The transponder would be on page 4 of my list of things I'd worry about... ... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If the antenna is under you, and it is vertically polarized, then you need a
ground plane. That can be a metal disc 1/2 wave in each direction from the coax. 1/4 wave is the distance it is tall. I made a plate about 3/4 wavelength and that should reduce radiation substantially. I was at a meeting regarding ham radio antennas. Some woman testified that she was afraid the ham radio antenna down the street was frying her brain. Her proof that radio waves were bad was that most of the ham operators had gray hari. During the break, she went outside, lit up a cigarette and got on her cell phone. Colin |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I see I had a typo. The ground plane (disc) must be 1/4 wave in each
direction minimum. Greater diameter can be used, but is not necessary for proper operation. It may be helptul in reducing readiation above the inverted antenna. Colin |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's not quite true. It has to be an odd integer multiple of a quarter
wave to operate properly...that's 1/4, 3/4, 5/4, and so on. The antenna itself is a quarter wave long, so if you want to use that as a template that would work. A quarter wave in air is about 2.75 inches long. Jim "COLIN LAMB" wrote in message ink.net... I see I had a typo. The ground plane (disc) must be 1/4 wave in each direction minimum. Greater diameter can be used, but is not necessary for proper operation. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The ideal ground plane should be perfectly conducting and infinite
(according to John Kraus in his book Antennas). It is true that the "measured impedance of a stub antenna varies appreciably as a function of the ground-plane-diameter", but the variation diminishes as the diameter is increased. Large square ground planes result in less variation than round ones. From the standpoint of radiation shielding, the larger plane should be better than small ones. Colin |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Transponder andtenna radiation | [email protected] | Home Built | 0 | March 4th 07 03:08 PM |
Transponder Antenna Thought | Gary Emerson | Soaring | 18 | April 19th 06 10:05 PM |
VHF & Transponder antenna | Steve | Home Built | 1 | December 6th 04 04:29 PM |
Oil on transponder antenna | Bob | Owning | 12 | May 9th 04 08:59 PM |
Transponder and antenna | Paolo | Soaring | 1 | March 6th 04 03:32 AM |