![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm curious, how does one controller secure a direct clearance through
mulitple other controllers' areas? Sometimes it seems that after a handoff the receiving controller doesn't know what your clearance is (but certainly must have that area available for you). As a typical example, I was flying home from Monterey last night and, after passing the San Jose arrival area, received an updated clearance, direct to my destination. Two controllers later, the controllers asked me if I was direct to the VOR. I said no, I'm direct home. I'm curious how the issuing controller is able to ensure a clearance all the way home direct. And how is it that a receiving controller doesn't know what a plane's current clearance is? Doesn't this all make it hard to plan conflict free traffic??? Do controller's "own" their own areas or does the computer? Can the computer approve a clearance through a controller's area w/o his acknowledgement? Does a controller need the computer to approve what he does in his area? -Robert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't pretend to be an expert, but my educated guess is that each
controller is interested only in his/her own airspace and doesn't really care about what happens after you are handed off to the next sector. Bob Gardner "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message oups.com... I'm curious, how does one controller secure a direct clearance through mulitple other controllers' areas? Sometimes it seems that after a handoff the receiving controller doesn't know what your clearance is (but certainly must have that area available for you). As a typical example, I was flying home from Monterey last night and, after passing the San Jose arrival area, received an updated clearance, direct to my destination. Two controllers later, the controllers asked me if I was direct to the VOR. I said no, I'm direct home. I'm curious how the issuing controller is able to ensure a clearance all the way home direct. And how is it that a receiving controller doesn't know what a plane's current clearance is? Doesn't this all make it hard to plan conflict free traffic??? Do controller's "own" their own areas or does the computer? Can the computer approve a clearance through a controller's area w/o his acknowledgement? Does a controller need the computer to approve what he does in his area? -Robert |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 26, 2:02 pm, "Bob Gardner" wrote:
I don't pretend to be an expert, but my educated guess is that each controller is interested only in his/her own airspace and doesn't really care about what happens after you are handed off to the next sector. But the question is, does he care about clearances through his airspace issued by other controllers? And, does he know what clearances aircraft have that enter his airspace? -Robert |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, he has a flight strip with the full clearance on it (or in some cases an
electronic flight strip -- ZMP is in the process of conversion.) If you are getting vectors, he may not have the vector though. I don't believe that the automated handoff has any facility for passing the vector information, although part of the data tag in a handoff (from Center to a TRACON for example) can indicate the runway that the flight is being vectored for. I just spent 3 hours plugged in at several positions in the MSP TRACON and one of the things I learned is that when you check in with a new controller and have been getting vectors they like you to include your assigned heading. For example, "Cherokee November blah blah blah is level at 7 thousand, heading zero two zero" and not just "Cherokee November blah blah blah is level at 7 thousand" which is what I had been doing. Another interesting thing I learned was that the TRACON radar doesn't show the little vector that indicates direction of flight like the Center radars do. There's just the target dot and the data block. So you can sin big time on your heading and, if you don't sin too long, the controller will never know. At MSP anyway. Some of the controllers will undoubtedly chime in here. On 3/26/2007 4:05 PM, Robert M. Gary wrote the following: On Mar 26, 2:02 pm, "Bob Gardner" wrote: I don't pretend to be an expert, but my educated guess is that each controller is interested only in his/her own airspace and doesn't really care about what happens after you are handed off to the next sector. But the question is, does he care about clearances through his airspace issued by other controllers? And, does he know what clearances aircraft have that enter his airspace? -Robert |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Mitty wrote: If you are getting vectors, he may not have the vector though. The previous controller is required to coordinate that. I don't believe that the automated handoff has any facility for passing the vector information, although part of the data tag in a handoff (from Center to a TRACON for example) can indicate the runway that the flight is being vectored for. The center has no control over my data tag. The center does not vector to a runway, that is an approach controls job. Another interesting thing I learned was that the TRACON radar doesn't show the little vector that indicates direction of flight like the Center radars do. That's because center controllers are retarded and wouldn't know which way the little airplanes are moving if the computer doesn't tell them. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Newps" wrote in message . ..
Mitty wrote: Another interesting thing I learned was that the TRACON radar doesn't show the little vector that indicates direction of flight like the Center radars do. That's because center controllers are retarded and wouldn't know which way the little airplanes are moving if the computer doesn't tell them. ROTFL! Good zinger, Newps. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On 3/26/2007 9:28 PM, Newps wrote the following: Mitty wrote: If you are getting vectors, he may not have the vector though. The previous controller is required to coordinate that. My experience is limited to sitting with MSP and ZMP controllers but I am sure I saw cases where the handoff was automated and there was no talk on the telephone. Possibly these are standardized routes where everyone knows what the vector is. Or is there a way this info would have been coded into the data tag & I just didn't notice? I don't believe that the automated handoff has any facility for passing the vector information, although part of the data tag in a handoff (from Center to a TRACON for example) can indicate the runway that the flight is being vectored for. The center has no control over my data tag. The center does not vector to a runway, that is an approach controls job. Possibly it is different at MSP. When I was sitting at the north arrivals position the data tags on the targets coming from Center were already marked for the runway. "V3R" or something like that, indicating that the flight was headed to 30 right. Possibly there is an LOA where Center picks the runway/approach gate based on the direction the flight is coming from, then adds the tag. But it was definitely there when the target began to flash, before Approach took the handoff. Another interesting thing I learned was that the TRACON radar doesn't show the little vector that indicates direction of flight like the Center radars do. That's because center controllers are retarded and wouldn't know which way the little airplanes are moving if the computer doesn't tell them. So, you work at a TRACON, right? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message oups.com...
On Mar 26, 2:02 pm, "Bob Gardner" wrote: I don't pretend to be an expert, but my educated guess is that each controller is interested only in his/her own airspace and doesn't really care about what happens after you are handed off to the next sector. But the question is, does he care about clearances through his airspace issued by other controllers? And, does he know what clearances aircraft have that enter his airspace? -Robert I think there's some coordination that we pilots don't see. Occasionally I go from central Ohio to northern Minnesota via FWA OSH AUW BJI, which narrowly skirts some special-use airspaces. One Sunday morning before reaching Ft Wayne, a ZID controller asked me if I'd like to go direct Bemidji. I answered, "Yes, but they usually won't let me do that." Her reply: "It's not busy this morning. I think I can work it out for you." And she did. And I thanked her for that. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Robert M. Gary wrote: But the question is, does he care about clearances through his airspace issued by other controllers? The clearance is on the strip. If it's different the previous controller is required to coordinate. And, does he know what clearances aircraft have that enter his airspace? That's a requirement of the previous controller. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I used to handle that by saying to the new controller "BuzzBomb 234X, 7000
feet, on a vector." A previous controller can't issue an instruction that has any effect in a subsequent sector, to the best of my knowledge, and the "new" controller can do whatever s/he needs to do without regard for what the previous controller did or said. Bob Gardner "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message oups.com... On Mar 26, 2:02 pm, "Bob Gardner" wrote: I don't pretend to be an expert, but my educated guess is that each controller is interested only in his/her own airspace and doesn't really care about what happens after you are handed off to the next sector. But the question is, does he care about clearances through his airspace issued by other controllers? And, does he know what clearances aircraft have that enter his airspace? -Robert |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Big Debts are costing troops their Security clearances | Tiger | Naval Aviation | 8 | October 28th 06 01:53 AM |
Obtaining IFR clearances in Canada | Andrew Sarangan | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | July 22nd 04 03:47 PM |
Question: civilian contractors and security clearances | Charlie Wolf | Naval Aviation | 5 | July 6th 04 03:54 AM |
Clearances for Practice | Jerry Kaidor | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | March 28th 04 07:00 PM |
Where is approach good about multiple approaches and clearances in the air? | Andrew Gideon | Instrument Flight Rules | 29 | February 14th 04 02:51 AM |