![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/annex/an51.htm
.... more "borrowed" German-tech courtesy of Dr. Alexander Lippisch. From the Lippisch DM-1/P.13 we got the XF-92, F-102, F-106, and B-58. Rob |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "robert arndt" wrote in message om... http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/annex/an51.htm ... more "borrowed" German-tech courtesy of Dr. Alexander Lippisch. From the Lippisch DM-1/P.13 we got the XF-92, F-102, F-106, and B-58. Rob On that basis the V-2 was built using borrowed US technology. 'Goddard was ahead of us all ' Werner Von Braun Keith |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
'Goddard was ahead of us all '
Werner Von Braun Typical German understatement. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ...
"robert arndt" wrote in message om... http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/annex/an51.htm ... more "borrowed" German-tech courtesy of Dr. Alexander Lippisch. From the Lippisch DM-1/P.13 we got the XF-92, F-102, F-106, and B-58. Rob On that basis the V-2 was built using borrowed US technology. 'Goddard was ahead of us all ' Werner Von Braun Keith Right... Germany got it's rocketry from Oberth, not Goddard: http://www.oberth-museum.org/museum_e.htm BTW, the Allies had no equivalent to the V-2 and most every other German missile design. Postwar it was German tech that made the US and USSR superpowers... unless you still believe a lone bomber-dropped A-bomb could sustain that status. As a matter of fact 85% of our current weapon systems are derived from technology of the Second and Third Reichs. Then there is also the space programs of the US and USSR ![]() It is so unbelievable to read this nonsense about the "USA invented everything" crap. If it wasn't for Germany and two World Wars (which you guys hate so much) the US would just be some second-rate regional power still playing games with Mexico and central America. Get a clue. Rob |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "robert arndt" wrote in message om... "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... "robert arndt" wrote in message om... http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/annex/an51.htm ... more "borrowed" German-tech courtesy of Dr. Alexander Lippisch. From the Lippisch DM-1/P.13 we got the XF-92, F-102, F-106, and B-58. Rob On that basis the V-2 was built using borrowed US technology. 'Goddard was ahead of us all ' Werner Von Braun Keith Right... Germany got it's rocketry from Oberth, not Goddard: http://www.oberth-museum.org/museum_e.htm BTW, the Allies had no equivalent to the V-2 and most every other German missile design. Postwar it was German tech that made the US and USSR superpowers... unless you still believe a lone bomber-dropped A-bomb could sustain that status. As a matter of fact 85% of our current weapon systems are derived from technology of the Second and Third Reichs. Then there is also the space programs of the US and USSR ![]() It is so unbelievable to read this nonsense about the "USA invented everything" crap. If it wasn't for Germany and two World Wars (which you guys hate so much) the US would just be some second-rate regional power still playing games with Mexico and central America. And if it were not for that second World War (which you apparently don't hate in and of itself, instead just not particularly caring for the outcome) we'd be goosestepping and sending our special students to the ovens instead of special education classes in public schools. Thank goodness things did not turn out as you would have hoped. Brooks |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Kevin Brooks" wrote:
And if it were not for that second World War (which you apparently don't hate in and of itself, instead just not particularly caring for the outcome) we'd be goosestepping and sending our special students to the ovens instead of special education classes in public schools. Thank goodness things did not turn out as you would have hoped. Brooks Still ****ed at having to take the short bus, eh? Get over it. Grantland |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
(robert arndt) wrote: "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... "robert arndt" wrote in message om... http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/annex/an51.htm ... more "borrowed" German-tech courtesy of Dr. Alexander Lippisch. From the Lippisch DM-1/P.13 we got the XF-92, F-102, F-106, and B-58. Rob On that basis the V-2 was built using borrowed US technology. 'Goddard was ahead of us all ' Werner Von Braun Keith Right... Germany got it's rocketry from Oberth, not Goddard: http://www.oberth-museum.org/museum_e.htm BTW, the Allies had no equivalent to the V-2 and most every other German missile design. Postwar it was German tech that made the US and USSR superpowers... unless you still believe a lone bomber-dropped A-bomb could sustain that status. As a matter of fact 85% of our current weapon systems are derived from technology of the Second and Third Reichs. Airplanes? no. Micro electronics? no. Radar? No. Rocketry? See Robert Goddard -- Von Braun & Co. developed his concepts. Atomic bombs? The stupid Hitler & Co. evicted their best theoretical physicists (Einstein & Co.) to the US. Thank you! Aerial refueling? no. Satellites? Developed from Von Braun & Co. Then there is also the space programs of the US and USSR ![]() It is so unbelievable to read this nonsense about the "USA invented everything" crap. If it wasn't for Germany and two World Wars (which you guys hate so much) the US would just be some second-rate regional power still playing games with Mexico and central America. Get a clue. It is fortunate that the Germans had such a bunch of lunatics for leaders that they lost the wars they started. If they hadn't started the wars, they MIGHT have been successful! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Orval Fairbairn wrote in message .. .
In article , (robert arndt) wrote: "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... "robert arndt" wrote in message om... http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/annex/an51.htm ... more "borrowed" German-tech courtesy of Dr. Alexander Lippisch. From the Lippisch DM-1/P.13 we got the XF-92, F-102, F-106, and B-58. Rob On that basis the V-2 was built using borrowed US technology. 'Goddard was ahead of us all ' Werner Von Braun Keith Right... Germany got it's rocketry from Oberth, not Goddard: http://www.oberth-museum.org/museum_e.htm BTW, the Allies had no equivalent to the V-2 and most every other German missile design. Postwar it was German tech that made the US and USSR superpowers... unless you still believe a lone bomber-dropped A-bomb could sustain that status. As a matter of fact 85% of our current weapon systems are derived from technology of the Second and Third Reichs. Airplanes? no. There were many inventors from many nations on the way to inventing the aircraft in the fields of aerodynamics and propulsion: from Caley, Lilienthal, the Stinson Victorian aerial steamer etc. The Wrights got there first only just. Several people got there in 1904 and 1905 and several may have done earlier. Despite Amerians being most probably first it is inevitable that someone would have done so independantly in several other nations. An Englishman, Frenchman and German would have followed soon. Micro electronics? no. That certainly belongs to Noyce though there was some German transistor work. Konrad Zuse quite independantly invented the computer and even a high level language. Most of his Z series machines used relays (thus making them more reliable and more funtional than valve machines) and they had floating point arithmetic and they did work on a valve powered FLAK computer. Radar? No. A German called Christian Husselmeyer apparently invented radar in 1903 after witnessing loss of life on a barge that collided in a fogged up Rhine River. German radar was well developed quite independantly before WW2. It was superior to British radar in most ways. Part of the problem was that the Freya and Wurzburg were so good that they encouraged the Germans to neglect microwave radar developement. Wurzburg even used Doppler to overcome window and chaff. http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/ops/docs/97-0609F.pdf: DEFLATING BRITISH RADAR MYTHS OF WORLD WAR II A Research Paper Presented To The Research Department Air Command and Staff College In Partial Fulfillment of the Graduation Requirements of ACSC by Maj. Gregory C. Clark March 1997 4 Incredibly, in 1904 a German inventor, Christian Hülsmeyer, was granted a British patent for a telemobiloscope, which was a 'hertzian-wave projecting and receiving apparatus…to give warning of the resence of a metallic body such as a ship or a train.' On the morning of 10 May 1904, at the Rhine bridge in Cologne, he successfully demonstrated his apparatus. With rave reviews from the press, technical representatives from various shipping companies observed a convincing display of this new technology. He proved that a ship fitted with this system of transmitter and receiver could locate another ship and inform the captain of the approach of another vessel up to 5 kilometers away. The shipping company representatives were enthusiastic, but hesitant to invest in this new technology and afraid of violating previous agreements with the Marconi Company. The shipping companies had trouble differentiating between wireless directional finding versus the idea of radio detection. In their minds it seemed to be spending twice for the same results. Hülsmeyer also sought the financial backing of the German Navy only to be rebuffed by Admiral von Tirpitz's reply of, 'Not interested. My people have better ideas!' Only after a personal expenditure of 25,000 Marks and approaching bankruptcy did he abandon his idea to pursue more financially rewarding work.6 What is important about this is the fact that as early as 1904 the concept of radar was demonstrated and patented. Hülsmeyer’s techniques revealed modern concepts which would not be rediscovered for another thirty years. His idea of mounting the assembly on the foremast of a ship to measure the range and bearing of an object did not reappear until the Second World War. It is also interesting to reflect how this invention would have changed history in the instance of the loss of the passenger ship Titanic and the World War I naval battle of Jutland.7 http://groups.google.com.au/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&safe=off&threadm=9iv8uk%24dsq%241%40nntp6.u.wash ington.edu&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26safe%3Doff%26q%3Dflak%2Bpredictor%2Bproximity% 26btnG%3DGoogle%2BSearch The British received as an invaluable gift a well-made tube, a part of an early attempted iteration of such a fuze, which measured electrical potentials and could serve to trigger a detonator if the potential detected were high enough. The gift came as part of what came to be known as the Oslo Report, so-named because that was the city in which a German engineer (IIRC) disaffected with the Nazi regime, used to transmit this remarkable and priceless document to the British. In it were described all of the most advanced technologies then under consideration by the Hitlerites, including the proximity fuse, in great detail. Rocketry? See Robert Goddard -- Von Braun & Co. developed his concepts. Atomic bombs? The stupid Hitler & Co. evicted their best theoretical physicists (Einstein & Co.) to the US. Thank you! Einstein was a bit of a celebrity myth. There is not much that he actually developed at all. E = mc^2 was elucidated in public and published by an Italian several years before Einstein (who spoke Italian as his father was an Nth Italian Jew) and his polio crippled serbian wife used Bernhard Rieman's Tensor calculus to put his theories back together again after Heisenberg shot them down. Between Maz Plank, Michelson & Morley, Maxwell, Rieman, Fitzgerald & Lorenz it's impossible to see that Einstein did anything but clever plagiarism and self publicity. He was littlemore than an ethnophobic zionist in my eyes. Goddard's work was excellent but even after sponsorship by Daniel Guggenheim it seems to have gone nowhere. The use of gyro-steered vains on the rocketry motor seems and intuitively obvious development of the Auto-Pilot. I think its more a case of parrallel development rather than 'copying'. von Braun't socieity for spaceflight goes back to the early 20s afterall. One invention the V2 people did come up with was the PIGA (pendulating integration gyroscopic accelerometer) which was accurate enough to provide for inertial navigation. Aerial refueling? no. The Germans mande several succesfull aerial refuelings during WW2 though they rejected them as impracticable for attacks on the USA. What made aerial refueling a success was the developement of the jet engine and the elimination of the prop collision issue. You might have seen Me 262s aerial refueling perhaps from a probe and drogue fed from a whatever big aircraft hr Germans had but certainly never a P51 and and very unlikely a P38. What made aerial refueling practicable on a P80 from a B29 made it practicable from a Me 262 from a He 177 or Ju 352 or Ju 390 Satellites? Developed from Von Braun & Co. Then there is also the space programs of the US and USSR ![]() It is so unbelievable to read this nonsense about the "USA invented everything" crap. If it wasn't for Germany and two World Wars (which you guys hate so much) the US would just be some second-rate regional power still playing games with Mexico and central America. Get a clue. It is fortunate that the Germans had such a bunch of lunatics for leaders that they lost the wars they started. If they hadn't started the wars, they MIGHT have been successful! A favourable winter, rather than the worst winter in 100 years, in the Soviet Union may have changed all of that. Possibley the biggest mistake they made was the Hitler dictate that no developments that could not be completed within 2 years should be preceded with. This seems to have cost them their excellent microwave development team in 1940 and the development of the proximity fuse (both were put on ice). The dictate may have been sensible however: Germany and the Axis were thoroughly outnumbered and out resourced and devoting resources and engineers on future developements may have been flawed as those resources were best applied to immediate issues. To the Axis it was win now or face inevevitable defeat in a war of attrition that the Allies would win on the basis of superior resources. The Germans certainly made breakthrough reasearch in ballistic, rocketry guidence, jet propulsion, stealth (radar aborbant paints and structures on sub conning towers and the Go 229 aircraft) swept wing aerodynamics (Busmann in 1930s). Even in doctrine the Germans were "right" in the long run (though utter wrong in the short run) as they anticipated that passive sensor technology would be necessary as any emiter would be detected and attacked. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
50% of NAZI oil was supplied from US | Grantland | Military Aviation | 106 | January 18th 14 07:58 PM |
German KT-P2 Celestial Navigation Kompass | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:51 PM |
Soviet Submarines Losses - WWII | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 4 | October 30th 03 03:09 AM |
German historian provokes row over war photos | BackToNormal | Military Aviation | 21 | October 24th 03 11:32 PM |
Joint German-Israeli airforce excersie (Israeli airforce beats German pilots) | Quant | Military Aviation | 8 | September 25th 03 05:41 PM |