![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've made this flight many times before and never encountered this
before. I filed from my home airport (MGY) to PT(which is an NDB) to CYKZ using DUATS. Everything went fine. When I called for my clearance, they didn't have anything on me. So I departed VFR, and tried calling again. Still no luck. They tried manually entering my flight, but then said they had trouble entering my Canadian waypoint and destination so I better call Flight Service. I filed with FSS and called ATC again, but still ATC had nothing for me. I called FSS again. Now he says his computer would not take CYKZ or PT, and the only way he could do this is if I provided the lat/lon for these places. After shuffling through a lot of mess, I found the co- ordinates for CYKZ and read the numbers. I said forget the enroute waypoint; I'll go direct. After nearly one hour after departure I finally got my clearance. It was good time too because we were in IMC not too long after that. I was totally puzzled by this. Since when did Canadian airports and navaids disappear from US computers? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 1, 8:52*pm, Andrew Sarangan wrote:
I've made this flight many times before and never encountered this before. I filed from my home airport (MGY) to PT(which is an NDB) to CYKZ using DUATS. Everything went fine. When I called for my clearance, they didn't have anything on me. So I departed VFR, and tried calling again. Still no luck. They tried manually entering my flight, but then said they had trouble entering my Canadian waypoint and destination so I better call Flight Service. I filed with FSS and called ATC again, but still ATC had nothing for me. I called FSS again. Now he says his computer would not take CYKZ or PT, and the only way he could do this is if I provided the lat/lon for these places. After shuffling through a lot of mess, I found the co- ordinates for CYKZ and read the numbers. I said forget the enroute waypoint; I'll go direct. After nearly one hour after departure I finally got my clearance. It was good time too because we were in IMC not too long after that. I was totally puzzled by this. Since when did Canadian airports and navaids disappear from US computers? I've done this by filing an international flight plan. Is that what you are doing or are you trying to file an FAA IFR plan? The international is the long form that asks about ADF, VORs, etc installations. -Robert |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 4, 3:09*pm, "Robert M. Gary" wrote:
On Jun 1, 8:52*pm, Andrew Sarangan wrote: I've made this flight many times before and never encountered this before. I filed from my home airport (MGY) to PT(which is an NDB) to CYKZ using DUATS. Everything went fine. When I called for my clearance, they didn't have anything on me. So I departed VFR, and tried calling again. Still no luck. They tried manually entering my flight, but then said they had trouble entering my Canadian waypoint and destination so I better call Flight Service. I filed with FSS and called ATC again, but still ATC had nothing for me. I called FSS again. Now he says his computer would not take CYKZ or PT, and the only way he could do this is if I provided the lat/lon for these places. After shuffling through a lot of mess, I found the co- ordinates for CYKZ and read the numbers. I said forget the enroute waypoint; I'll go direct. After nearly one hour after departure I finally got my clearance. It was good time too because we were in IMC not too long after that. I was totally puzzled by this. Since when did Canadian airports and navaids disappear from US computers? I've done this by filing an international flight plan. Is that what you are doing or are you trying to file an FAA IFR plan? The international is the long form that asks about ADF, VORs, etc installations. -Robert- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, I filed an FAA flight plan using DUATS. It worked every single time in the past. I have even filed FROM Canada to the US using DUATS and it has always worked. This time, DUATS accepted it, but nothing got transmitted to ATC. I am going to try again on my way back this weekend. It could have been a temporary glitch. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, I filed CYKZ to KBUF using DUATS and the tower at CYKZ had my
IFR clearance without any problems. So the problem appears to be with FSS and ATC. They were unable to enter the Canadian destinations, but DUATS seems do the job. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, Andrew Sarangan said:
I was totally puzzled by this. Since when did Canadian airports and navaids disappear from US computers? Not quite the same thing, but every time I fly IFR to Ottawa, I get told to fly the CYRIL SEVEN STAR. But DUATS and Flight Service won't accept CYRIL as a waypoint, so I file to ART, then direct. And as I get close to ART, Wheeler-Sack Approach comes on the air and says "I have a revised clearance for you", and then clears me to fly to CYRIL and then the CYRIL SEVEN arrival. -- Paul Tomblin http://blog.xcski.com/ [Y]ou should write for the comprehension of the next programmer who looks at your code, keep it clean and sensible, and *not* play any obscure Jedi mind-tricks. -- Anthony de Boer |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What happened to Canadian airports on Skyvector and Aeroplanner? | Andrew Sarangan | Piloting | 6 | May 6th 08 09:57 PM |
filing stars | Brad Salai | Instrument Flight Rules | 7 | August 10th 05 10:19 PM |
Filing with a STAR | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 25 | October 16th 04 04:23 AM |
Canadian Maritime Airports: Request for Info | David Megginson | Piloting | 0 | July 22nd 04 03:24 PM |
filing with DUATS | Ditch | Instrument Flight Rules | 20 | January 14th 04 09:38 AM |