![]()  | 
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. | 
		
			
  | 	
	
	
		
		|||||||
| 
		 | 
	Thread Tools | Display Modes | 
| 
	 | 
| 
		 
			 
			#1  
			 
            
			
			
			
		 
		
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
	
	
		
			
			 
http://www.familyairlines.com/index7.html 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
		
	
	
	I stumbled across this the other day and found it interesting, to say the least. A startup airline that plans to operate 14 747-400s initially with max density seating (581 pax - can you say "cattle car"??) with fares ranging from $19 to $99. They expect 100% load factors and have a new business model for a revenue stream. Maybe it's the cynic in me, but I can't see using a widebody profitably for a 205nm segment (LAS to LAX) while filling seats. I'm also wondering who is extending the credit required to lease 14 747s. Last I heard that market was pretty tight. Their initial DOT filing was made in January this year. I guess that means the Part 121 application is in the works too?  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#2  
			 
            
			
			
			
		 
		
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
	
	
		
			
			 
Kingfish  wrote: 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
		
	
	
	http://www.familyairlines.com/index7.html I stumbled across this the other day and found it interesting, to say the least. A startup airline that plans to operate 14 747-400s initially with max density seating (581 pax - can you say "cattle car"??) with fares ranging from $19 to $99. They expect 100% load factors and have a new business model for a revenue stream. Maybe it's the cynic in me, but I can't see using a widebody profitably for a 205nm segment (LAS to LAX) while filling seats. I'm also wondering who is extending the credit required to lease 14 747s. Last I heard that market was pretty tight. Their initial DOT filing was made in January this year. I guess that means the Part 121 application is in the works too? Vegas tourism is currently in the toilet. They might have been able to get 100% load factors back in January, but currently I think that is fantasy. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply.  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#3  
			 
            
			
			
			
		 
		
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
	
	
		
			
			 
On Nov 24, 6:23*pm, Kingfish  wrote: 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
		
	
	
	http://www.familyairlines.com/index7.html I stumbled across this the other day and found it interesting, to say the least. A startup airline that plans to operate 14 747-400s initially with max density seating (581 pax - can you say "cattle car"??) with fares ranging from $19 to $99. They expect 100% load factors and have a new *business model for a revenue stream. Maybe it's the cynic in me, but I can't see using a widebody profitably for a 205nm segment (LAS to LAX) while filling seats. I'm also wondering who is extending the credit required to lease 14 747s. Last I heard that market was pretty tight. Their initial DOT filing was made in January this year. I guess that means the Part 121 application is in the works too? It also takes about 45 minutes to load a 747. Seems like it would be more economical to operate 737's and just fly 3 times more often. The low fares are misleading because the casinos are paying part of the fare -Robert  | 
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
		
  | 
	
		
  | 
			 
			Similar Threads
		 | 
	||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| FSX startup bug | Charles O'Flynn | Simulators | 1 | January 6th 07 07:48 PM | 
| engine startup problem | Frank Ch. Eigler | Owning | 12 | June 4th 05 07:00 PM | 
| Oil smoke on startup | Gyroplanes | Rotorcraft | 0 | November 10th 04 05:26 PM | 
| STec-30 doesn't pass startup test after I shorted something.... | Dave | Owning | 12 | January 18th 04 06:47 AM | 
| Cessna 172K Hawk XP startup procedure? | Andrew Boyd | Owning | 1 | July 7th 03 02:40 AM |