![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.familyairlines.com/index7.html
I stumbled across this the other day and found it interesting, to say the least. A startup airline that plans to operate 14 747-400s initially with max density seating (581 pax - can you say "cattle car"??) with fares ranging from $19 to $99. They expect 100% load factors and have a new business model for a revenue stream. Maybe it's the cynic in me, but I can't see using a widebody profitably for a 205nm segment (LAS to LAX) while filling seats. I'm also wondering who is extending the credit required to lease 14 747s. Last I heard that market was pretty tight. Their initial DOT filing was made in January this year. I guess that means the Part 121 application is in the works too? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kingfish wrote:
http://www.familyairlines.com/index7.html I stumbled across this the other day and found it interesting, to say the least. A startup airline that plans to operate 14 747-400s initially with max density seating (581 pax - can you say "cattle car"??) with fares ranging from $19 to $99. They expect 100% load factors and have a new business model for a revenue stream. Maybe it's the cynic in me, but I can't see using a widebody profitably for a 205nm segment (LAS to LAX) while filling seats. I'm also wondering who is extending the credit required to lease 14 747s. Last I heard that market was pretty tight. Their initial DOT filing was made in January this year. I guess that means the Part 121 application is in the works too? Vegas tourism is currently in the toilet. They might have been able to get 100% load factors back in January, but currently I think that is fantasy. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 24, 6:23*pm, Kingfish wrote:
http://www.familyairlines.com/index7.html I stumbled across this the other day and found it interesting, to say the least. A startup airline that plans to operate 14 747-400s initially with max density seating (581 pax - can you say "cattle car"??) with fares ranging from $19 to $99. They expect 100% load factors and have a new *business model for a revenue stream. Maybe it's the cynic in me, but I can't see using a widebody profitably for a 205nm segment (LAS to LAX) while filling seats. I'm also wondering who is extending the credit required to lease 14 747s. Last I heard that market was pretty tight. Their initial DOT filing was made in January this year. I guess that means the Part 121 application is in the works too? It also takes about 45 minutes to load a 747. Seems like it would be more economical to operate 737's and just fly 3 times more often. The low fares are misleading because the casinos are paying part of the fare -Robert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FSX startup bug | Charles O'Flynn | Simulators | 1 | January 6th 07 06:48 PM |
engine startup problem | Frank Ch. Eigler | Owning | 12 | June 4th 05 06:00 PM |
Oil smoke on startup | Gyroplanes | Rotorcraft | 0 | November 10th 04 04:26 PM |
STec-30 doesn't pass startup test after I shorted something.... | Dave | Owning | 12 | January 18th 04 05:47 AM |
Cessna 172K Hawk XP startup procedure? | Andrew Boyd | Owning | 1 | July 7th 03 01:40 AM |