![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Having done most of my flying at lower altitudes, I have wondered
about the contradicton between my unscientific observations when flying at high altitude and what I would expect from my somewhat limited knowledge of physics and aerodymanics. I certainly believe that true airspeed increases with altitude. I use a rule of thumb of about 2 percent per thousand. So (at 17,000 feet) a Indicated airspeed of 42 knots becomes 56 knots true airspeed. An indicated airspeed of 70 knots becomes 94 knots true airspeed. It just does not feel like or the instruments don't seem to indicate sink rates (I have made no careful observations) one would expect for the higher true air speeds. Is there no free lunch? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question: Standard rate turns, constant rate turns, and airspeed | Robert Barker | Piloting | 5 | April 15th 07 04:47 PM |
My weird sink drain | AES | Piloting | 11 | April 13th 06 10:17 AM |
will the CBS forgeries sink Kerry? | Cub Driver | Military Aviation | 3 | September 14th 04 12:12 AM |
Rounding a turnpoint in sink | CV | Soaring | 13 | July 22nd 04 05:27 PM |