![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dude" wrote in message ... Poor? It has the same engine as a 172 SP or an Archer, but it gets an extra 20 knots. I suppose you could slow it down to Archer speeds and get more range. The same engine burns the same gallons per hour no matter what you put it in. The Lycoming IO-360 burns about 10 gph whether it is in a DA-40 or a 172S. Since the DA-40 goes farther in that hour it should go farther than the same amount of gas in a 172S. The reason the 172S has a longer range is that it has bigger fuel tanks. The DA-40 does offer an option of bigger tanks; it will then fly farther than the 172S. Useful load for the two planes is about the same, so essentially you could carry a little more payload in the DA-40 than in the 172S for the same trip. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SWRFI Pirep.. (long) | Dave S | Home Built | 20 | May 21st 04 03:02 PM |
Garmin 1000 turn co-ordinator? | John H. Kay | Instrument Flight Rules | 21 | December 31st 03 03:37 PM |