![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 00:04:06 GMT, "SeeAndAvoid"
wrote: First off, as we are reminded quite often, the AIM is not regulatory. No, but Part 97 is, and prescribes a mandatory procedure turn for that approach unless one of the exceptions in Part 91 is met. And none of them were met. The 7110.65 requirements for issuing radar vectors to a final approach course were also not met. --ron |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| where to ask question about approach? | J Haggerty | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | August 17th 04 07:30 AM |
| Canadian holding procedures | Derrick Early | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | July 22nd 04 05:03 PM |
| Approach Question- Published Missed Can't be flown? | Brad Z | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | May 6th 04 05:19 AM |
| Why is ADF or Radar Required on MFD ILS RWY 32 Approach Plate? | S. Ramirez | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | April 2nd 04 12:13 PM |
| Established on the approach - Checkride question | endre | Instrument Flight Rules | 59 | October 6th 03 05:36 PM |