![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Thanks Roger for bringing this thread back on track to the original question. I appreciate all the input, however diverse :-) I consider myself to be reasonably sharp with the full use and limitations of avionics now fitted. In conclusion, I have to ensure that I am truly ready and competent to use "all" or "any" or "any part of" or "almost none" of the installed equipment during my instrument checkride. The thread has also caused a timely reminder to change my pre-flight check list to include all the various coupled modes of the Century IIB AP operation and the new roll steering unit. Up to now I only check wing leveling and DG bug following on the ground. Thanks to all. -- Roy Piper Archer N5804F "Roger" wrote in message ... On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:57:17 GMT, "Roy N5804F" wrote: I've seen a lot of answers on here, but the standard approach (no pun intended) is to *expect* and be prepared to use any and all instruments installed on the airplane. That includes autopilot. GPS, LORAN, what ever and be able to demonstrate how to program it in flight. You probably won't have to, but if you don't know how that will probably be what you get quizzed on and have to use. They are very good at finding out how well you know your equipment. Yes, I had to demonstrate the use of the autopilot which couples to the DG, RNAV, and VOR receivers. With a fully ticked out bird you probably won't have to use all of that equipment, but you may or may not be questioned on it. However you probably won't know ahead of time which. Certainly those that are used for your primary navigation are likely to be covered in depth so I'd want to be very familiar with that new stack. You have an NDB. Most likely you will get to use it. Loran? It's just a back up. That way *maybe* you only get to explain how you use it. On my flight the examiner asked me how the RNAV "worked" so I started out with the technical explanation as to how it "worked". After about a minute he stopped me and said, "I meant, how do you use it". Big difference:-)). Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Accuracy of GPS in Garmin 430/530 | Will | Instrument Flight Rules | 110 | May 29th 06 04:58 PM |
Instrument Rating Checkride PASSED (Very Long) | Alan Pendley | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | December 16th 04 02:16 PM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
CFI logging instrument time | Barry | Instrument Flight Rules | 21 | November 11th 03 12:23 AM |
Use of hand-held GPS on FAA check ride | Barry | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | August 9th 03 09:25 PM |