A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

R172K Approach Configuration



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 1st 07, 04:54 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Mike Adams[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 134
Default R172K Approach Configuration

Matt Whiting wrote:

I like the recommendations made in Peter Dogan's book, The Instrument
Flight Training Manual. However, as your instructor said, there is no
single right power setting. If you assume no wind conditions, then a
90K approach speed works well as that yields close to 90 knots ground
speed (not exact due to the descent angle, but really close) which
matches up with one entry in the time charts for timed approaches.


Don't forget that 90 K indicated airspeed only equals 90 knots ground speed at sea level on a standard
day with no wind. At higher altitudes, your TAS (and GS depending on the wind) will be significantly
higher.

Regardless, I agree with most of your post. I find the Dogan-style performance numbers are a good
starting point, and help to get configuration changes stabilized. It does then require tweaking to suit the
specific conditions, though.

Mike
  #2  
Old January 1st 07, 05:23 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,232
Default R172K Approach Configuration

Mike Adams wrote:
Matt Whiting wrote:


I like the recommendations made in Peter Dogan's book, The Instrument
Flight Training Manual. However, as your instructor said, there is no
single right power setting. If you assume no wind conditions, then a
90K approach speed works well as that yields close to 90 knots ground
speed (not exact due to the descent angle, but really close) which
matches up with one entry in the time charts for timed approaches.



Don't forget that 90 K indicated airspeed only equals 90 knots ground speed at sea level on a standard
day with no wind. At higher altitudes, your TAS (and GS depending on the wind) will be significantly
higher.

Regardless, I agree with most of your post. I find the Dogan-style performance numbers are a good
starting point, and help to get configuration changes stabilized. It does then require tweaking to suit the
specific conditions, though.


Yes, very true. I was trying to keep it simple and most people in the
USA fly from airports that are 2,000' MSL or less which doesn't
introduce huge errors due to non-standard conditions. However,
certainly if you are landing in Leadville, then it is a big deal.

Matt
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RAF Blind/Beam Approach Training flights Geoffrey Sinclair Military Aviation 3 September 4th 09 06:31 PM
VFR position reporting Mxsmanic Piloting 154 November 26th 06 04:45 PM
IFR Approach questions Roy Smith Instrument Flight Rules 2 November 7th 05 02:11 AM
Approaches and takeoff mins. jamin3508 Instrument Flight Rules 22 September 14th 05 02:51 AM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.